我在使用 apa6 类和文档类型时遇到问题：由于论文有许多作者/附属机构等，标题页设置得相当低，只留下“摘要”标题和摘要正文在下一页。这看起来相当丑陋，我不知道如何解决。请帮忙！
\documentclass[doc,11pt,a4paper,natbib,floatsintext]{apa6}
\usepackage[german,serbian,american]{babel}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{tabulary}
\usepackage{multirow}
\usepackage{rotating}
\usepackage{xspace}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{url}
\usepackage{times}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{csquotes}
\shorttitle{Revision revisited}
\leftheader{Myname, Hername, Hisname, Hername, Hisname}
\title
{Processing parts and a whole:
\protect\\
An information-theoretic approach to some interesting stuffs}
\fiveauthors
{Myname Mysurname}{Hername Hersurname}{Hisname Hissurname}
{Hername Hersurname}{Hisname Hissurname}
\fiveaffiliations
{My affiliation at the University of something \&
My second affiliation at the University of something else}
{Her affiliation at the University of something}
{His affiliation at the University of something}
{Her affiliation at the University of something \&
Her second affiliation at the University of something else}
{His affiliation at the University of something \&
His second affiliation at the University of something else}
\authornote{
Please send correspondence to me: \\
Email: [email protected] \\ \ \\
\noindent
This research was supported some guys.
}
\abstract{
Converting light into matter may sound like alchemy, but it's a natural outcome of physics – one that scientists have been demonstrating to varying degrees for decades. Now, a team of European physicists is proposing a way to do it much more simply.
If the approach works as the researcher's initial calculations suggest, the results are unlikely immediately answer any vexing question, physicists say. The fundamental science behind the process of turning light to matter is already well understood. But it would be a new tool in physicists' toolkit.
Currently, the process of getting packets of light, known as photons, to collide and make particles can be a complicated business, requiring a few tricks. But the new technology might enable a range of new experiments, which could lead to unexpected answers or uses.
The tool is a collider for photons, the subatomic particles associated with visible light and other forms of electromagnetic radiation, such as radio waves and gamma rays. By crashing them head-on, the collider would turn the photons into electrons and their anti-matter counterparts, positrons. Calculations suggesting how this might work appear in the current issue of the journal Nature Photonics.
The theory behind this was first proposed in 1934 by two American physicists, Gregory Breit and John Wheeler. But it wasn't until 1997 that scientists working at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) in Stanford, Calif., were able to successfully carry out the first true photon-to-photon collision and create the two particles.
They did it by using electrons to ricochet light back into itself. The team accelerated a beam of electrons to high energies, then blasted the beam with a laser. Some of the photons in the laser scattered off these electrons, traveling back toward the laser beam and picking up energy in the process. When these higher-energy photons collided with additional photons the laser was sending out, the collisions produced pairs of electrons and their antimatter counterparts, positrons.
}
\keywords{one, two, three, four, five}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{document}
\maketitle
\section{Introduction}
Converting light into matter may sound like alchemy, but it's a natural outcome of physics – one that scientists have been demonstrating to varying degrees for decades. Now, a team of European physicists is proposing a way to do it much more simply.
If the approach works as the researcher's initial calculations suggest, the results are unlikely immediately answer any vexing question, physicists say. The fundamental science behind the process of turning light to matter is already well understood. But it would be a new tool in physicists' toolkit.
Currently, the process of getting packets of light, known as photons, to collide and make particles can be a complicated business, requiring a few tricks. But the new technology might enable a range of new experiments, which could lead to unexpected answers or uses.
The tool is a collider for photons, the subatomic particles associated with visible light and other forms of electromagnetic radiation, such as radio waves and gamma rays. By crashing them head-on, the collider would turn the photons into electrons and their anti-matter counterparts, positrons. Calculations suggesting how this might work appear in the current issue of the journal Nature Photonics.
The theory behind this was first proposed in 1934 by two American physicists, Gregory Breit and John Wheeler. But it wasn't until 1997 that scientists working at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) in Stanford, Calif., were able to successfully carry out the first true photon-to-photon collision and create the two particles.
They did it by using electrons to ricochet light back into itself. The team accelerated a beam of electrons to high energies, then blasted the beam with a laser. Some of the photons in the laser scattered off these electrons, traveling back toward the laser beam and picking up energy in the process. When these higher-energy photons collided with additional photons the laser was sending out, the collisions produced pairs of electrons and their antimatter counterparts, positrons.
\end{document}
第一页如下所示：
答案1
经过大量的搜索和反复试验，我找到了这个（半）解决方案：只需手动生成摘要和关键字，即不在序言中提供这些“字段”。但是，我添加了小的序言片段来更改边距以使摘要更漂亮。这将导致警告消息，但输出看起来会更好。以下是上面的更正代码：
\documentclass[doc,11pt,a4paper,natbib,floatsintext]{apa6}
\usepackage[german,serbian,american]{babel}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{tabulary}
\usepackage{multirow}
\usepackage{rotating}
\usepackage{xspace}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{url}
\usepackage{times}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{csquotes}
%-- Margins change
\def\changemargin#1#2{\list{}{\rightmargin#2\leftmargin#1}\item[]}
\let\endchangemargin=\endlist
\shorttitle{Revision revisited}
\leftheader{Myname, Hername, Hisname, Hername, Hisname}
\title
{Processing parts and a whole:
\protect\\
An information-theoretic approach to some interesting stuffs}
\fiveauthors
{Myname Mysurname}{Hername Hersurname}{Hisname Hissurname}
{Hername Hersurname}{Hisname Hissurname}
\fiveaffiliations
{My affiliation at the University of something \&
My second affiliation at the University of something else}
{Her affiliation at the University of something}
{His affiliation at the University of something}
{Her affiliation at the University of something \&
Her second affiliation at the University of something else}
{His affiliation at the University of something \&
His second affiliation at the University of something else}
\authornote{
Please send correspondence to me: \\
Email: [email protected] \\ \ \\
\noindent
This research was supported some guys.
}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{document}
\maketitle
\vspace*{2\baselineskip}
\begin{changemargin}{2cm}{2cm}
{\small{
\begin{center}
{\bf Abstract}
\end{center}
Converting light into matter may sound like alchemy, but it's a natural outcome
of physics – one that scientists have been demonstrating to varying degrees for
decades. Now, a team of European physicists is proposing a way to do it much
more simply.
If the approach works as the researcher's initial calculations suggest, the
results are unlikely immediately answer any vexing question, physicists say. The
fundamental science behind the process of turning light to matter is already
well understood. But it would be a new tool in physicists' toolkit.
Currently, the process of getting packets of light, known as photons, to collide
and make particles can be a complicated business, requiring a few tricks. But
the new technology might enable a range of new experiments, which could lead to
unexpected answers or uses.
The tool is a collider for photons, the subatomic particles associated with
visible light and other forms of electromagnetic radiation, such as radio waves
and gamma rays. By crashing them head-on, the collider would turn the photons
into electrons and their anti-matter counterparts, positrons. Calculations
suggesting how this might work appear in the current issue of the journal
Nature Photonics.
The theory behind this was first proposed in 1934 by two American physicists,
Gregory Breit and John Wheeler. But it wasn't until 1997 that scientists
working at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) in Stanford, Calif.,
were able to successfully carry out the first true photon-to-photon collision
and create the two particles.
They did it by using electrons to ricochet light back into itself. The team
accelerated a beam of electrons to high energies, then blasted the beam with a
laser. Some of the photons in the laser scattered off these electrons, traveling
back toward the laser beam and picking up energy in the process. When these
higher-energy photons collided with additional photons the laser was sending
out, the collisions produced pairs of electrons and their antimatter
counterparts, positrons.
Keywords: one, two, three, four, five
}}
\end{changemargin}
\vspace*{4\baselineskip}
\section{Introduction}
Converting light into matter may sound like alchemy, but it's a natural outcome
of physics – one that scientists have been demonstrating to varying degrees for
decades. Now, a team of European physicists is proposing a way to do it much
more simply.
If the approach works as the researcher's initial calculations suggest, the results
are unlikely immediately answer any vexing question, physicists say. The fundamental
science behind the process of turning light to matter is already well understood.
But it would be a new tool in physicists' toolkit.
Currently, the process of getting packets of light, known as photons, to collide
and make particles can be a complicated business, requiring a few tricks. But the
new technology might enable a range of new experiments, which could lead to
unexpected answers or uses.
The tool is a collider for photons, the subatomic particles associated with visible
light and other forms of electromagnetic radiation, such as radio waves and gamma
rays. By crashing them head-on, the collider would turn the photons into electrons
and their anti-matter counterparts, positrons. Calculations suggesting how this
might work appear in the current issue of the journal Nature Photonics.
The theory behind this was first proposed in 1934 by two American physicists,
Gregory Breit and John Wheeler. But it wasn't until 1997 that scientists working
at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) in Stanford, Calif., were able to
successfully carry out the first true photon-to-photon collision and create the two
particles.
They did it by using electrons to ricochet light back into itself. The team
accelerated a beam of electrons to high energies, then blasted the beam with a
laser. Some of the photons in the laser scattered off these electrons, traveling
back toward the laser beam and picking up energy in the process. When these
higher-energy photons collided with additional photons the laser was sending out,
the collisions produced pairs of electrons and their antimatter counterparts,
positrons.
\end{document}
现在，第一页看起来好多了（我认为）：
