☰

Biblatex-dw：使用@incollection xref 时如何避免出现两个条目？

tag-icon • tag-icon biblatex-dw
Biblatex-dw：使用@incollection xref 时如何避免出现两个条目？

xref当超过两个作品时，使用 withbiblatex-dw可以正常工作，但是如果我用它仅引用集合/书籍中的一篇文章，则会很烦人，因为参考书目显示两个条目：一个（不完整）用于文章，另一个用于集合/书籍。

第 13-14 页biblatex-dw 手册指出 mincrossrefs 设置1为以避免信息不完整。换句话说，使用xref意味着打印父条目，即使只有一个子条目。

所以，我的问题是：如何为单个@incollection 生成独立的书目条目？

在以下 MWE 中，预期结果是：Hobsbawm 文章的一个条目，其余部分保持原样。

\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib}
@inbook{Hobsbawm2011a1,
    author = {Hobsbawm, Eric},
    title = {On the \emph{Communist Manifesto}},
    pages = {101--120},
    xref = {Hobsbawm2011a},
}
@book{Hobsbawm2011a,
    author = {Hobsbawm, Eric},
    title = {How to Change the World. Reflections on Marx and Marxism},
    shorttitle = {How to Change the World},
    publisher = {Yale},
    address = {New Haven/London},
    year = {2011},
}
@collection{Cowling2002,
    booktitle = {Marx's \emph{Eighteenth Brumaire}. (Post)modern Interpretations},
    title = {Marx's \emph{Eighteenth Brumaire}. (Post){\-}modern Interpretations},
    shorttitle = {Marx's \emph{Eighteenth Brumaire}},
    editor = {Cowling, Mark and Martin, James},
    address = {London, Sterling/\textsc{va}},
    publisher = {Pluto},
    year = {2002}
}
@incollection{Jessop2002,
    author = {Bob Jessop},
    title = {The Political Scene and the Politics of Representation: Periodising Class Struggle and the State in the \emph{Eighteenth Brumaire}},
    shorttitle = {The Political Scene and the Politics of Representation},
    pages = {179--194},
    xref = {Cowling2002}
}
@incollection{Martin2002,
    author = {Martin, James},
    title = {Performing Politics: Class, Ideology and Discourse in Marx's  \emph{Eighteenth Brumaire}},
    shorttitle = {Performing Politics},
    pages = {129--142},
    xref = {Cowling2002}
}
\end{filecontents}
\usepackage[backend=biber,
style=authortitle-dw,
%firstfull=true,
xref=true,
]{biblatex}
\addbibresource{\jobname}

\begin{document}
\cite{Hobsbawm2011a1}

\cite{Martin2002}

\cite{Jessop2002}

\printbibliography

\end{document}

MWE. biblatex-dw 与 @incollection xref

答案1

根据设计，该xref字段的子条目永远不会从父条目继承数据。替代方案取决于crossref基于哪个xref。（主要区别恰恰在于继承。）

因此你可以这样做：

\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib}
@inbook{Hobsbawm2011a1,
    author = {Hobsbawm, Eric},
    title = {On the {\mkbibemph{Communist Manifesto}}},
    pages = {101--120},
    crossref = {Hobsbawm2011a},
}
@book{Hobsbawm2011a,
    author = {Hobsbawm, Eric},
    title = {How to Change the World. Reflections on Marx and Marxism},
    shorttitle = {How to Change the World},
    publisher = {Yale},
    address = {New Haven/London},
    year = {2011},
}
@collection{Cowling2002,
    booktitle = {Marx's \emph{Eighteenth Brumaire}. (Post)modern Interpretations},
    title = {Marx's \emph{Eighteenth Brumaire}. (Post){\-}modern Interpretations},
    shorttitle = {Marx's \emph{Eighteenth Brumaire}},
    editor = {Cowling, Mark and Martin, James},
    address = {London, Sterling/\textsc{va}},
    publisher = {Pluto},
    year = {2002}
}
@incollection{Jessop2002,
    author = {Bob Jessop},
    title = {The Political Scene and the Politics of Representation: Periodising Class Struggle and the State in the \emph{Eighteenth Brumaire}},
    shorttitle = {The Political Scene and the Politics of Representation},
    pages = {179--194},
    xref = {Cowling2002}
}
@incollection{Martin2002,
    author = {Martin, James},
    title = {Performing Politics: Class, Ideology and Discourse in Marx's  \emph{Eighteenth Brumaire}},
    shorttitle = {Performing Politics},
    pages = {129--142},
    xref = {Cowling2002}
}
\end{filecontents}
\usepackage[backend=biber,
style=authortitle-dw,
mincrossrefs=2,
xref=true,
]{biblatex}
\addbibresource{\jobname}

\begin{document}
\cite{Hobsbawm2011a1}

\cite{Martin2002}

\cite{Jessop2002}

\printbibliography

\end{document}

一个或多个

这样做的缺点是，如果将所有内容更改xref为crossref，则有关集合的信息将在每个条目中重复。

这是我意识到使用biblatexBibTeX 而不是传统 BibTeX 的一大缺点。BibTeX 不仅可以做到这一点。它“只是”以您直观期望的方式与 BibTeX 配合使用。

相反，如果有好的biblatex解决方案，我还没有找到。出于某种原因，它似乎被设计用来做几乎总是错误的事情。我完全不知道为什么。更糟糕的是，错误的事情不仅仅是默认的。它似乎是唯一可能的设置。（毫无疑问，我只是对这种方法的优势视而不见。但事实就是如此。我就是盲目的。）

相关内容