我没有 MWE，因为这个出现在我正在处理的文档第 12 页的底部（令人惊讶）。我只是想知道是否有人会意识到发生了什么。在我看来，行间距发生了很大变化，而我并没有要求这样做：
这种行为不是被要求的，如果可能的话，我想确保它不会发生。我打印出来了\baselineskip，\baselinestretch它们在两个段落中看起来是相同的。
欢迎提供相关的调试提示。请注意，几段之后文档中的间距已恢复正常。
该区域的源代码（以及更多内容）是：
conversation is actually foundational for meaning. It looks as though
Ogden and Richards have already been all over this point, and so I'll
cede the floor to
them.\footnote{\url{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_of_reference}}
\paragraph{A fundamental dilemma}
Quote \ref{myq:71} puts forth the quote, which is not due to
\citet{serres1982parasite} (as it might appear) but which is actually
from \citet{clarke1999constructing} -- which I'm trying to track down.
\begin{quote}
With this recognition the phatic function becomes the constitutive
occasion for all communication, which can thus no longer be
conceptualized in the absence of difference and delay, resistance,
static, and noise.\footnote{Quoted it \cite{siegert2007cacography}.}
\end{quote}
Something very similar to this is what interested me in phatics in my
答案1
好的，接着 Barbara Beeton 的评论——这只是在标准文本和\begin{quote}and之间引入空格的问题\end{quote}。
conversation is actually foundational for meaning. It looks as though
Ogden and Richards have already been all over this point, and so I'll
cede the floor to them.\footnote{\url{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_of_reference}}
\paragraph{A fundamental dilemma}
Quote \ref{myq:71} puts forth the quote, which is not due to
\citet{serres1982parasite} (as it might appear) but which is actually
from \citet{clarke1999constructing} -- which I'm trying to track down.
\begin{quote}
With this recognition the phatic function becomes the constitutive
occasion for all communication, which can thus no longer be
conceptualized in the absence of difference and delay, resistance,
static, and noise.\footnote{Quoted it \cite{siegert2007cacography}.}
\end{quote}
Something very similar to this is what interested me in phatics in my