有人能向我解释一下我使用 BibLaTeX 时的错误吗?

有人能向我解释一下我使用 BibLaTeX 时的错误吗?
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage[style=numeric, citestyle=numeric]{biblatex}
\usepackage[UKenglish]{babel}
\begin{document}
\title{Progress Through Paradox}
\maketitle

\section{Introduction}
 mechanical development came, in equal measure, responses seeking to disprove 
them, as was the formulation of the 'EPR Paradox' in response to Heisenberg and 
Bohr's 'Copenhagen Interpretation' understanding of quantum mechanical variables 
(in particular their uncertainties)\cite{Copenhagen Interpretation}, 

\begin{thebibliography}{10}
\bibitem{Quantum Paradoxes}
Aharonov Y, Rohrlich D.
\textit{Quantum Theory for the Perplexed}
Quantum Paradoxes. 2005; 25-3, 46-51, 61-69.
\bibitem{Copenhagen Interpretation}
Heisenberg W.
 \textit{Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und 
Mechanik [The content of the quantum theoretical kinematics and mechanics]}.
 Z. Phys. 1927; 43: 172–198.
\bibitem{EPR}
Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N. 
\textit{Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered 
Complete?}.
Description of Physical Reality. 1935; 47: 777-780.
\bibitem{Bell's Inequality}
Bell J.
\textit{ON THE EINSTEIN PODOLSKY ROSEN PARADOX}.
Physics. 1964; 1[I]: 195-200.
\bibitem{Bohm's Spin Discussion}
Bohm D, Aharonov Y.
\textit{Discussion of Experimental Proof for the Paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and 
Podolsky}.
PHYSICAL REVIEW. 1957; 108-4: 1070-1076.
\bibitem{Spin-Bell's Theorem}
Mathpages: Quantum Entanglement and Bell's Theorem
\newline
http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath521/kmath521.htm
\end{thebibliography} 
\end{document}

“哥本哈根诠释”的引用出现不正确,我知道这可能是一个复杂的问题,但我一直试图弄清楚,但没有成功。

答案1

\bibitem定义参考书目条目的 ID biblatex,据我所知,那里不允许有空格。
为了避免语法错误,并能够以方便的方式管理所有参考文献,您应该使用bibtex编辑器。它将为您提供一个.bib包含正确格式的参考文献(文件)的数据库。这是您可以在文档中轻松引用的文件LaTeX。在大多数情况下,编辑器带有一个方便的用户界面来添加和排序您的参考文献,以及一个错误检查系统。这些编辑器的一个例子是平台无关的贾布雷夫

相关内容