\begin{table*}[h!]
\caption{list of unique effects on project plan with their descriptions}
\label{tab:defination}
\resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{
\centering
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{X|X|X}
\noindent
\begin{tabular}{
|p{\dimexpr.10\linewidth-2\tabcolsep-1.3333\arrayrulewidth}% column 1
|p{\dimexpr.26\linewidth-2\tabcolsep-1.3333\arrayrulewidth}% column 2
|p{\dimexpr.65\linewidth-2\tabcolsep-1.3333\arrayrulewidth}% column 3
}
\hline
No & Effects & Descriptions \\
\hline
1 & Project priority (EFF1) & Change in dependency of task and project milestone due to redirection, reallocation and prioritization of project scope resulting change in project priority. Thus change activities in the critical path and slips the project schedule \\
\hline
2 & Lack of motivation and direction (EFF2) & Difference in individual's perception, culture and scope cross cutting (De-scoping of feature) leads to decrease in staff motivation and unmeet project deadlines.\\
\hline
3 & Increase cost (EFF3) & Change in life cycle costing, unapproved scope, risk mitigation, initial estimates and adding more decision points increase project cost and reduce contingency reserved.\\
\hline
4 & Project resources change (EFF4) & Change in project resources (team member, project manager, hardware, software) with limited boundaries of the project leads to the scope issues and increases overhead for potential delays and budget.\\
\hline
5 & Project risks (EFF5) & Technological uncertainty, untried assumption constrains, requirement uncertainty and volatility (have impact on project risk management) can direct blowout cost afterwards.\\
\hline
6 & Rework (EFF6) & Redefining new process, methodology, strategy, policy, alternatives and assessments can cause impact through rework, resulting in budget and schedule overrun.\\
\hline
7 & Schedule delays (EFF7) & Number of breaks, waiting periods, third party tool provider, vague scope definition, ineffective or immature process contribute towards lengthy lead time. \\
\hline
8 & Communication and coordination gaps (EFF8) & Unrealistic scope changes, trust issues, in-appropriate sharing of document and
lack of decision making have an effect on non-technical issues like communication gaps. \\
\hline
9 & Quality issue(EFF9) & Quality attributes (performance, security, reliability, availability etc.), requirement volatility (code quality, quality of project management and developer's capability) and lack of commitment have an effect on project quality, as it decreases market share and brand value.\\
\hline
10 & Lower productivity (EFF10) & Workforce experience and forecasted completion date of the project has an effect on actual productivity. During project, increase in workforce size and process losses progressively decrease actual productivity. \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{tabularx}
%\label{table1:nonlin}
}
\end{table*}
给出错误缺失数字被视为零}。
答案1
发布的代码（如果完成到文档中）不会给出标题中的错误，它运行时没有错误，但有警告
LaTeX Warning: `!h' float specifier changed to `!ht'.
但是，它是一行一列的表格，并且单元格中有一个嵌套表格
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tabularx,graphicx}
\begin{document}
\begin{table*}[htp]
\caption{list of unique effects on project plan with their descriptions}
\label{tab:defination}
\small
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{l|>{\raggedright}p{3cm}|X}
\hline
No & Effects & Descriptions \\
\hline
1 & Project priority (EFF1) & Change in dependency of task and project milestone due to redirection, reallocation and prioritization of project scope resulting change in project priority. Thus change activities in the critical path and slips the project schedule \\
\hline
2 & Lack of motivation and direction (EFF2) & Difference in individual's perception, culture and scope cross cutting (De-scoping of feature) leads to decrease in staff motivation and unmeet project deadlines.\\
\hline
3 & Increase cost (EFF3) & Change in life cycle costing, unapproved scope, risk mitigation, initial estimates and adding more decision points increase project cost and reduce contingency reserved.\\
\hline
4 & Project resources change (EFF4) & Change in project resources (team member, project manager, hardware, software) with limited boundaries of the project leads to the scope issues and increases overhead for potential delays and budget.\\
\hline
5 & Project risks (EFF5) & Technological uncertainty, untried assumption constrains, requirement uncertainty and volatility (have impact on project risk management) can direct blowout cost afterwards.\\
\hline
6 & Rework (EFF6) & Redefining new process, methodology, strategy, policy, alternatives and assessments can cause impact through rework, resulting in budget and schedule overrun.\\
\hline
7 & Schedule delays (EFF7) & Number of breaks, waiting periods, third party tool provider, vague scope definition, ineffective or immature process contribute towards lengthy lead time. \\
\hline
8 & Communication and coordination gaps (EFF8) & Unrealistic scope changes, trust issues, in-appropriate sharing of document and
lack of decision making have an effect on non-technical issues like communication gaps. \\
\hline
9 & Quality issue(EFF9) & Quality attributes (performance, security, reliability, availability etc.), requirement volatility (code quality, quality of project management and developer's capability) and lack of commitment have an effect on project quality, as it decreases market share and brand value.\\
\hline
10 & Lower productivity (EFF10) & Workforce experience and forecasted completion date of the project has an effect on actual productivity. During project, increase in workforce size and process losses progressively decrease actual productivity. \\
\hline
\end{tabularx}
\end{table*}
\end{document}