先生/女士！
我的横向表格出现在文本主体中，而纵向表格出现在文件末尾。请帮我从文件文本中删除图形和表格，并将它们放在文件末尾，表格和图形标题列表之后。我附上了代码。
\documentclass[Journal,letterpaper]{ascelike-new}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{graphicx} %Allows to import images
\usepackage{float} %Allows for control of float positions
\graphicspath{ {images/} }
%Tables preamble
\usepackage[none]{hyphenat} %Stops breaking up words in a table
\usepackage{array}
\newcolumntype{$}{>{\global\let\currentrowstyle\relax}}
\newcolumntype{^}{>{\currentrowstyle}}
\newcommand{\rowstyle}[1]{\gdef\currentrowstyle{#1} #1\ignorespaces}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{lmodern}
\usepackage{pdflscape}
\usepackage{lscape}
\usepackage{rotating} % Provides {sideways}{sidewaysfigure}{sidewaystable} environments
\usepackage[figurename=Fig.,labelfont=bf,labelsep=period]{caption}
\usepackage{caption}
\usepackage{subcaption}
\captionsetup{compatibility=false}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{siunitx}
\usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
\usepackage[colorlinks=true,citecolor=black,linkcolor=black]{hyperref}
\usepackage{enumerate}% http://ctan.org/pkg/enumerate
%%Tables preamble
\usepackage[none]{hyphenat} %Stops breaking up words in a table
\usepackage{array}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{multirow}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{lipsum} % just for dummy text- not needed for a longtable
%Flowchart
\usepackage{tikz}
\usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric, arrows}
\NameTag{Singh, \today}
\begin{document}
The range of Strain transducer was +/- 4000 micro-strain, sensitivity = 500 micro-strain/Vout/Vext with accuracy < +/- 1 percent.
Based on theoretical simulation of the bridge using MATLAB, strain gages were placed at critical locations as shown in Fig. \ref{fig:sensorloc}.
%\begin{landscape}
%\begin{figure}[p !]
\begin{sidewaysfigure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{sensor_loc}
\caption{Location of sensors}
\label{fig:sensorloc}
\end{sidewaysfigure}
%\end{figure}
%\end{landscape}
\section{Observations and calculations}
The details of trains for which strains have been measured have been shown in Table \ref{tab:train_run}.
\begin{table}
\centering
\caption{Details of trains instrumented for Fatigue life estimation}
\label{tab:train_run}
\begin{tabular}{$p{0.6in}^p{.2in}^p{1.8in}^p{1.2in}^p{.4in}^p{1in}}
\hline\hline
Date& Run No& Train details& Engine details& Time (Hrs)& Speed (Kmph) \\
\hline
18.06.16& 1& 59 BOXN Empty Goods& 27540WAG7& 13:03& 20 to 5 to 20 \\
-do-& 2& 12347 Up Howrah Rampurhat Exp& 16225R/WDM3A& 13:35& 20 \\
-do-& 3& 12369 Up Upasana Exp& 22650/WAP4& 14:18& 20 \\
-do-& 4& 11448 Up Shaktipunj Exp& 22531/WAP4& 14:26& 20 \\
-do-& 5& 59 BXNHS Loaded Goods& 27537/WAG7& 14:46& 20 \\
19.06.16& 1& 13151 Up Jammu Tawi Exp& 22906/WAP4& 13:19& 20 \\
-do-& 2& 12347 Up Howrah Rampurhat Exp& 14006R/WDM3A& 13:28& 20 \\
-do-& 3& 58 BOXN Loaded Goods& 24693/WAG9& 14:00& 5 to 20 \\
\hline\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
%
\begin{longtable}{$p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}}
\caption{Cumulative GMT of Up Howrah-Barddhaman Chord line between Saktigarh and Barddhaman}
\label{tab:GMT} \\
\hline\hline
Year &Annual GMT&Annual GMT per line&Cum GMT\\
\hline
1996-97& 38& 19& 480.155\\
1997-98& 41& 20.5& 500.655\\
1998-99& 42& 21& 521.655\\
1999-00& 42& 21& 542.655\\
2000-01& 40& 20& 562.655\\
2001-02& 43& 21.5& 584.155\\
2002-03& 42& 21& 605.155\\
2003-04& 42& 21& 626.155\\
2004-05& 44& 22& 648.155\\
2005-06& 47& 23.5& 671.655\\
2006-07& 46& 23& 694.655\\
2007-08& 50& 25& 719.655\\
2008-09& 58& 29& 748.655\\
2009-10& 62& 31& 779.655\\
2010-11& 63& 31.5& 811.155\\
2011-12& 60& 30& 841.155\\
2012-13& 62& 31& 872.155\\
2013-14& 63& 31.5& 903.655\\
2014-15& 63& 31.5& 935.155\\
2015-16& 63& 31.5& 966.655\\
\hline\hline
\multicolumn{5}{l}{Note: Data obtained from Track Modernization Cell of Eastern Railway}
\end{longtable}
Sample calculation of effective cycles for the critical member i.e. cross girder (Strain gauge no. 2289) has been furnished in Table \ref{tab:SampleCalc}.
\begin{table}
\centering
\caption{Sample calculation of effective cycles for cross girder}
\label{tab:SampleCalc}
\begin{tabular}{$p{0.6in}^p{1.8in}^p{1.5in}^p{1.5in}}
\hline\hline
Stress range in N/mm2&No. of observed effective cycles from Rain flow histogram (say a)&No. of modified effective cycles (ni) = ax(68/8)x1.4)&No. of theoretical cycles (Ni) as per S-N curve x $10^6$ \\
\hline
0-10& 117& 1392& 3990.00 \\
10-20& 91& 1083& 498.75 \\
20-30& 1& 11.9& 147.78 \\
30-40& 2& 23.8& 62.34 \\
40-50& 2& 23.8& 31.92 \\
\hline\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
From Table \ref{tab:reslifeeuro3}, it is seen that stringers (after replacement) are still the critical members from fatigue considerations with residual fatigue life of 169 years.
\begin{sidewaystable}[]
\centering
\caption{Calculation of residual life from Fatigue considerations using S-N curve in Eurocode 3}
\label{tab:reslifeeuro3}
\begin{tabular}{lllllllllllllll}
\hline\hline
\multirow{3}{*}{Member} & \multirow{3}{*}{Strain} & \multicolumn{5}{c}{Observed ni for 8 trains (5 Pass + 3 Goods)} & \multicolumn{5}{c}{Equated for 68 trains (48 Pass + 20 Goods)} & {Damage} & {Total} & {Residual} \\
& & 0-10 & 10-20 & 20-30 & 30-40 & 40-50 & 0-10 & 10-20 & 20-30 & 30-40 & 40-50 & {per} & {life} & {life} \\
& Gauge & 35563 & 1111 & 146.35 & 34.73 & 11.38 & 35563 & 1111 & 146.35 & 34.73 & 11.38 & {Day(D)} \\
\hline
\multirow{1}{*}{Top chord} & 2897 & 125 & 4 & 3 & 1 & & 1488 & 47.6 & 35.7 & 11.9 & 0 & 0.3426 & 2399 & 2307 \\
Vertical & 2895 & 18 & & & & & 214.2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \\
\multirow{1}{*}{Diagonal} & 2892 & 92 & 1 & 2 & & & 1095 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \\
\multirow{1}{*}{End raker} & 2829 & 36 & 0 & 2 & 1 & & 428.4 & 0 & 23.8 & 11.9 & 0 & 0.3426 & 2399 & 2307 \\
\multirow{1}{*}{Bottom chord} & 2891 & 109 & 9 & & & & 1297 & 107 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \\
\multirow{1}{*}{Cross girder} & 2889 & 117 & 91 & 1 & 2 & 2 & 1392 & 1083 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 23.8 & 2.7767 & 296 & 204 \\
\multirow{1}{*}{Stringers} & 2890 & 107 & 111 & 1 & 2 & 4 & 1273 & 1321 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 47.6 & 4.8681 & 169 & 167* \\
\hline\hline \\
\multicolumn{5}{l}{*Not reduced as Stringers have been recently changed.} \\
\multicolumn{9}{l}{Theoretical cycles below 32MPa (stress below cut-off limit) have not been considered.}
\end{tabular}
\end{sidewaystable}
For this kind of cycle the maximum stress is equal to the minimum stress but completely opposite in nature i.e. $\sigma _m$ = 0 as shown Fig. \ref{fig:revcycle}.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.8]{HCFtest}
\caption{Experimental Setup of High Cycle Fatigue test}
\label{fig:hcftest}
\end{figure}
\pagebreak
\end{document}
能否帮忙...
谢谢你并问候 Sitesh
答案1
假设您的 documentclass与 CTAN 上的ascelike-new相同ascelike，则以下内容可能会解决您的问题。endfloat如果Journal使用了选项，documentclass 会在内部加载包。该endfloat包仅识别figure和table环境，因此longtables和sidewaystables会sidewaysfigures保留在文本中，而不是放在末尾。
手册的“8.2 基于图形和表格的环境”一节endfloat描述了\DeclareDelayedFloatFlavo(u)r{〈environment〉}{〈is a variant of〉}可以用来放置的命令endfloat，longtables以及sidewaysfigures文档末尾的其他派生环境。
在下面的 MWE 中，我将上面提到的命令括起来，
\AtBeginDocument{}因为 documentclass 也有条件地endfloat使用 加载包\AtBeginDocument{}。
\documentclass[Journal,letterpaper,BackFigs]{ascelike-new}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{graphicx} %Allows to import images
%\usepackage{float} %Allows for control of float positions
\graphicspath{ {images/} }
%Tables preamble
\usepackage[none]{hyphenat} %Stops breaking up words in a table
\usepackage{array}
\newcolumntype{$}{>{\global\let\currentrowstyle\relax}}
\newcolumntype{^}{>{\currentrowstyle}}
\newcommand{\rowstyle}[1]{\gdef\currentrowstyle{#1} #1\ignorespaces}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{lmodern}
\usepackage{pdflscape}
\usepackage{lscape}
\usepackage{rotating} % Provides {sideways}{sidewaysfigure}{sidewaystable} environments
\usepackage[figurename=Fig.,labelfont=bf,labelsep=period]{caption}
\usepackage{caption}
\usepackage{subcaption}
\captionsetup{compatibility=false}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{siunitx}
\usepackage{newtxtext,newtxmath}
\usepackage[colorlinks=true,citecolor=black,linkcolor=black]{hyperref}
\usepackage{enumerate}% http://ctan.org/pkg/enumerate
%%Tables preamble
\usepackage[none]{hyphenat} %Stops breaking up words in a table
\usepackage{array}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{multirow}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{lipsum} % just for dummy text- not needed for a longtable
%Flowchart
\usepackage{tikz}
\usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric, arrows}
\NameTag{Singh, \today}
\AtBeginDocument{%
\DeclareDelayedFloatFlavor{sidewaystable}{table}
\DeclareDelayedFloatFlavor{sidewaysfigure}{figure}
\DeclareDelayedFloatFlavor{longtable}{table}
}
\begin{document}
The range of Strain transducer was +/- 4000 micro-strain, sensitivity = 500 micro-strain/Vout/Vext with accuracy < +/- 1 percent.
Based on theoretical simulation of the bridge using MATLAB, strain gages were placed at critical locations as shown in Fig. \ref{fig:sensorloc}.
%\begin{landscape}
%\begin{figure}[p !]
\begin{sidewaysfigure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{example-image}
\caption{Location of sensors}
\label{fig:sensorloc}
\end{sidewaysfigure}
%\end{figure}
%\end{landscape}
\section{Observations and calculations}
The details of trains for which strains have been measured have been shown in Table \ref{tab:train_run}.
\begin{table}
\centering
\caption{Details of trains instrumented for Fatigue life estimation}
\label{tab:train_run}
\begin{tabular}{$p{0.6in}^p{.2in}^p{1.8in}^p{1.2in}^p{.4in}^p{1in}}
\hline\hline
Date& Run No& Train details& Engine details& Time (Hrs)& Speed (Kmph) \\
\hline
18.06.16& 1& 59 BOXN Empty Goods& 27540WAG7& 13:03& 20 to 5 to 20 \\
-do-& 2& 12347 Up Howrah Rampurhat Exp& 16225R/WDM3A& 13:35& 20 \\
-do-& 3& 12369 Up Upasana Exp& 22650/WAP4& 14:18& 20 \\
-do-& 4& 11448 Up Shaktipunj Exp& 22531/WAP4& 14:26& 20 \\
-do-& 5& 59 BXNHS Loaded Goods& 27537/WAG7& 14:46& 20 \\
19.06.16& 1& 13151 Up Jammu Tawi Exp& 22906/WAP4& 13:19& 20 \\
-do-& 2& 12347 Up Howrah Rampurhat Exp& 14006R/WDM3A& 13:28& 20 \\
-do-& 3& 58 BOXN Loaded Goods& 24693/WAG9& 14:00& 5 to 20 \\
\hline\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
%
\begin{longtable}{$p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}^p{1in}}
\caption{Cumulative GMT of Up Howrah-Barddhaman Chord line between Saktigarh and Barddhaman}
\label{tab:GMT} \\
\hline\hline
Year &Annual GMT&Annual GMT per line&Cum GMT\\
\hline
1996-97& 38& 19& 480.155\\
1997-98& 41& 20.5& 500.655\\
1998-99& 42& 21& 521.655\\
1999-00& 42& 21& 542.655\\
2000-01& 40& 20& 562.655\\
2001-02& 43& 21.5& 584.155\\
2002-03& 42& 21& 605.155\\
2003-04& 42& 21& 626.155\\
2004-05& 44& 22& 648.155\\
2005-06& 47& 23.5& 671.655\\
2006-07& 46& 23& 694.655\\
2007-08& 50& 25& 719.655\\
2008-09& 58& 29& 748.655\\
2009-10& 62& 31& 779.655\\
2010-11& 63& 31.5& 811.155\\
2011-12& 60& 30& 841.155\\
2012-13& 62& 31& 872.155\\
2013-14& 63& 31.5& 903.655\\
2014-15& 63& 31.5& 935.155\\
2015-16& 63& 31.5& 966.655\\
\hline\hline
\multicolumn{5}{l}{Note: Data obtained from Track Modernization Cell of Eastern Railway}
\end{longtable}
Sample calculation of effective cycles for the critical member i.e. cross girder (Strain gauge no. 2289) has been furnished in Table \ref{tab:SampleCalc}.
\begin{table}
\centering
\caption{Sample calculation of effective cycles for cross girder}
\label{tab:SampleCalc}
\begin{tabular}{$p{0.6in}^p{1.8in}^p{1.5in}^p{1.5in}}
\hline\hline
Stress range in N/mm2&No. of observed effective cycles from Rain flow histogram (say a)&No. of modified effective cycles (ni) = ax(68/8)x1.4)&No. of theoretical cycles (Ni) as per S-N curve x $10^6$ \\
\hline
0-10& 117& 1392& 3990.00 \\
10-20& 91& 1083& 498.75 \\
20-30& 1& 11.9& 147.78 \\
30-40& 2& 23.8& 62.34 \\
40-50& 2& 23.8& 31.92 \\
\hline\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
From Table \ref{tab:reslifeeuro3}, it is seen that stringers (after replacement) are still the critical members from fatigue considerations with residual fatigue life of 169 years.
\begin{sidewaystable}[]
\centering
\caption{Calculation of residual life from Fatigue considerations using S-N curve in Eurocode 3}
\label{tab:reslifeeuro3}
\begin{tabular}{lllllllllllllll}
\hline\hline
\multirow{3}{*}{Member} & \multirow{3}{*}{Strain} & \multicolumn{5}{c}{Observed ni for 8 trains (5 Pass + 3 Goods)} & \multicolumn{5}{c}{Equated for 68 trains (48 Pass + 20 Goods)} & {Damage} & {Total} & {Residual} \\
& & 0-10 & 10-20 & 20-30 & 30-40 & 40-50 & 0-10 & 10-20 & 20-30 & 30-40 & 40-50 & {per} & {life} & {life} \\
& Gauge & 35563 & 1111 & 146.35 & 34.73 & 11.38 & 35563 & 1111 & 146.35 & 34.73 & 11.38 & {Day(D)} \\
\hline
\multirow{1}{*}{Top chord} & 2897 & 125 & 4 & 3 & 1 & & 1488 & 47.6 & 35.7 & 11.9 & 0 & 0.3426 & 2399 & 2307 \\
Vertical & 2895 & 18 & & & & & 214.2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \\
\multirow{1}{*}{Diagonal} & 2892 & 92 & 1 & 2 & & & 1095 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \\
\multirow{1}{*}{End raker} & 2829 & 36 & 0 & 2 & 1 & & 428.4 & 0 & 23.8 & 11.9 & 0 & 0.3426 & 2399 & 2307 \\
\multirow{1}{*}{Bottom chord} & 2891 & 109 & 9 & & & & 1297 & 107 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - & - \\
\multirow{1}{*}{Cross girder} & 2889 & 117 & 91 & 1 & 2 & 2 & 1392 & 1083 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 23.8 & 2.7767 & 296 & 204 \\
\multirow{1}{*}{Stringers} & 2890 & 107 & 111 & 1 & 2 & 4 & 1273 & 1321 & 11.9 & 23.8 & 47.6 & 4.8681 & 169 & 167* \\
\hline\hline \\
\multicolumn{5}{l}{*Not reduced as Stringers have been recently changed.} \\
\multicolumn{9}{l}{Theoretical cycles below 32MPa (stress below cut-off limit) have not been considered.}
\end{tabular}
\end{sidewaystable}
For this kind of cycle the maximum stress is equal to the minimum stress but completely opposite in nature i.e. $\sigma _m$ = 0 as shown Fig. \ref{fig:revcycle}.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.8]{example-image}
\caption{Experimental Setup of High Cycle Fatigue test}
\label{fig:hcftest}
\end{figure}
\pagebreak
\end{document}