Nginx 和 gunicorn 未显示整个页面(缓存问题)

Nginx 和 gunicorn 未显示整个页面(缓存问题)

我有一个 django 应用程序,它在 django 服务器上运行良好。我刚刚将其配置为与 nginx 和 gunicorn 一起工作。除了其中一个页面外,几乎每个页面都运行良好。这是一个相当大的页面,包含 4 个选择(下拉)菜单,每个菜单有 1000 个条目,所有这些都由 guinicorn 通过单个 html 文件发送。Gunicorn 只显示页面的一半。同样有趣的是,如果没有 nginx,gunicorn 可以很好地显示整个页面。尽管生成的页面不是静态的,但出于某种原因,nginx 会破坏页面。

这是我的 nginx 配置:

ec2-user@ip-172-31-44-39:~/mira_website> sudo cat /etc/nginx/sites-available/miraFrontEnd
# This is example contains the bare minimum to get nginx going with
# Gunicornservers.

worker_processes 1;


user ec2-user nogroup; # for systems with a "nogroup"
# user nobody nobody; # for systems with "nobody" as a group instead

# Feel free to change all paths to suit your needs here, of course
pid /tmp/nginx.pid;
error_log /tmp/nginx.error.log;

events {
  worker_connections 1024; # increase if you have lots of clients
  accept_mutex off; # "on" if nginx worker_processes > 1
  # use epoll; # enable for Linux 2.6+
  # use kqueue; # enable for FreeBSD, OSX
}

http {
  # nginx will find this file in the config directory set at nginx build time
#  include mime.types;

  # fallback in case we can't determine a type
  default_type application/octet-stream;

  # click tracking!
  access_log /tmp/nginx.access.log combined;

  # you generally want to serve static files with nginx since neither
  # Unicorn nor Rainbows! is optimized for it at the moment
  sendfile on;

  tcp_nopush on; # off may be better for *some* Comet/long-poll stuff
  tcp_nodelay off; # on may be better for some Comet/long-poll stuff

  gzip on;
  gzip_http_version 1.0;
  gzip_proxied any;
  gzip_min_length 500;
  gzip_disable "MSIE [1-6]\.";
  gzip_types text/plain text/html text/xml text/css
             text/comma-separated-values
             text/javascript application/x-javascript
             application/atom+xml;

  upstream app_server {

    # for UNIX domain socket setups:
    server unix:/home/ec2-user/gunicorn.sock fail_timeout=0;

    # for TCP setups, point these to your backend servers
    # server 192.168.0.7:8080 fail_timeout=0;
    # server 192.168.0.8:8080 fail_timeout=0;
    # server 192.168.0.9:8080 fail_timeout=0;
  }

  server {
    # listen 80 default deferred; # for Linux
    # listen 80 default accept_filter=httpready; # for FreeBSD
    listen 8000;

    client_max_body_size 4G;
    server_name _;

    keepalive_timeout 10;


    location /static {
        autoindex on;
        alias /home/ec2-user/mira_website/manageDb/static/;
    }

    location / {
      # checks for static file, if not found proxy to app
      try_files $uri @proxy_to_app;
    }

    location @proxy_to_app {
      # an HTTP header important enough to have its own Wikipedia entry:
      #   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-Forwarded-For
      proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;

      # enable this if and only if you use HTTPS, this helps Rack
      # set the proper protocol for doing redirects:
      # proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto https;

      # pass the Host: header from the client right along so redirects
      # can be set properly within the Rack application
      proxy_set_header Host $http_host;

      # we don't want nginx trying to do something clever with
      # redirects, we set the Host: header above already.
      proxy_redirect off;

      proxy_pass http://app_server;

    }

    # Error pages
    error_page 500 502 503 504 /500.html;
    location = /500.html {
      root /path/to/app/current/public;
    }
  }
}

该服务器在搭载 Suse Linux 的 amazon ec2 上运行。

有任何想法吗?

编辑:好吧,这很有趣,我清除了浏览器的缓存、历史记录、cookie 和所有内容,它开始工作了。然后,几分钟后再试一次,它又出现了同样的问题。所以看起来,当我清除缓存时,它开始工作,但只持续了一段时间(奇怪!)。

答案1

我尝试了很多不同的配置,并使其正常工作,但我不确定实际情况如何。我认为情况是 指令调用的proxy_buffering。现在将其设置为off

此外,可能解决此问题的方法是设置proxy_buffer_size size这里是关于该指令的官方文档。

相关内容