Linux使用OOM杀手； Mac 是做什么的？
答案1
Mac OS X 允许您分配“很多”，尽管系统可能会疯狂地崩溃，也可能会很好，具体取决于如何分配的内存由任何后续代码使用。pkill在分配了“很多”整数（通过标志）之后，我可能不得不执行以下代码-M，尽管我已经有一段时间没有在 Mac OS X 上进行测试了。
/*
# (Ab)uses memory via the allocation of a block of memory, with a given
# number of worker threads that then read and write values randomly
# within that space. This code was motivated by the fact that while
# `perl -e '1 while 1' &` can run up the CPU, one is more likely to run
# into fork limits than CPU bottlenecks on modern multi-processor
# systems. This code better exercises a system. Basically, it offers a
# means to bog a system down, presumably for testing purposes, race
# condition exploration, or to annoy the local sysadmin.
#
# System resource limits may need to be adjusted; see login.conf(5) on
# OpenBSD, for example. There may also be per-process limitations. A
# good way to bog the system down is to run something like:
#
# for i in ...; do ./usemem -M -t ... & done
#
# Where the number of processes to launch and the thread count are
# suitable to the number of CPUs or desired level of insanity. A timed
# pkill(1) or easy access to reset the test system should be arranged
# for, given that too many instances of this program may render a
# system quite inoperative--a desktop linux system `vmstat 1` recorded
# 12 million context switches in an entry, presumably over some time
# period longer than a second, given how poorly that system was
# performing. Shortly thereafter, the display froze up, and the system
# had to be power cycled (I could still ping the box).
#
# The original intent of this code was to try to trigger a race
# condition on:
#
# alarm(...);
# somethingthatblocksforever();
# alarm(0);
# // -- paraphrased from Stevens, APUE (1st edition), p. 286.
#
# whereby the system is made busy enough that the SIGALRM happens
# before the somethingthatblocks() call can be started, but after the
# alarm(...) is established, so that the process then blocks forever.
# It is perhaps far more likely that the system will be rendered
# unusable (and monitoring notice this) than to hit this unlikely edge
# case. If a system has been inordinately busy or slow, a reboot may
# well be in order as soon as is practical. This will eliminate the
# possiblilty that any process remains stuck on some rare edge case
# such as the above.
#
# Portability: -M does sensible things on OpenBSD; on Linux and Mac OS
# X it runs afoul various amounts of stupidity or insanity that may
# require `-M -m upperlimit` to set the maximum allowed allocation.
# This will help prevent the OOM killer from blasting away or the
# kernel optimistically trying to allocate 17,592,186,044,416 integers
# and then somehow getting bogged down.
#
# The code used to try to realloc() the array upwards, if possible,
# though that on Linux ran afoul the OOM killer. Since dead processes
# do not much tax a system, only downsizes are done. Launch more
# instances of this script to use up the remaining memory.
#
# Swapping might be induced by starting an instance, then sending it
# the CONT signal, then starting more instances? Need to test this.
*/
#include <err.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <limits.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sysexits.h>
#include <unistd.h>
// https://github.com/thrig/goptfoo
#include <goptfoo.h>
// https://github.com/thrig/libjkiss
#include <jkiss.h>
#define MOSTMEMPOSSIBLE ( (ULONG_MAX < SIZE_MAX) ? ULONG_MAX : SIZE_MAX )
bool Flag_Auto_Mem; // -M
unsigned long Flag_Memory; // -m (amount, though internally # of ints)
unsigned long Flag_Threads; // -t
int *Memory;
pthread_mutex_t Lock = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
pthread_cond_t Done_Malloc = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER;
pthread_cond_t Never_Happens = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER;
void emit_help(void);
void *worker(void *unused);
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int ch;
pthread_t *tids;
jkiss64_init(NULL);
while ((ch = getopt(argc, argv, "h?Mm:t:")) != -1) {
switch (ch) {
case 'M':
Flag_Auto_Mem = true;
break;
case 'm':
Flag_Memory = flagtoul(ch, optarg, 1UL, MOSTMEMPOSSIBLE);
break;
case 't':
Flag_Threads = flagtoul(ch, optarg, 1UL, ULONG_MAX);
break;
case 'h':
case '?':
default:
emit_help();
/* NOTREACHED */
}
}
argc -= optind;
argv += optind;
if ((Flag_Memory == 0 && !Flag_Auto_Mem) || Flag_Threads == 0)
emit_help();
/* Ahh gee em. Complicated. See, if you malloc() the most memory
* possible, then there is no space for the threads. So must spin
* the threads up first, and then binary search realloc() to find
* the most memory possible. Presumably other instances of this
* program or other processes will be run to eat up any remaining
* memory on the system.
*/
if ((tids = calloc(sizeof(pthread_t), Flag_Threads)) == NULL)
err(EX_OSERR, "could not calloc() threads list");
for (unsigned long i = 0; i < Flag_Threads; i++) {
if (pthread_create(&tids[i], NULL, worker, NULL) != 0)
err(EX_OSERR, "could not pthread_create() thread %lu", i);
}
if (Flag_Auto_Mem) {
if (!Flag_Memory)
Flag_Memory = MOSTMEMPOSSIBLE;
Flag_Memory /= sizeof(int);
while (Flag_Memory) {
if ((Memory = malloc(Flag_Memory * sizeof(int))) == NULL) {
Flag_Memory >>= 1;
} else {
break;
}
}
if (Memory) {
fprintf(stderr, "info: auto-alloc picks %lu ints\n", Flag_Memory);
} else {
err(EX_OSERR, "could not auto-malloc() %lu ints", Flag_Memory);
}
} else {
Flag_Memory /= sizeof(int);
if ((Memory = malloc(Flag_Memory * sizeof(int))) == NULL)
err(EX_OSERR, "could not malloc() %lu ints", Flag_Memory);
}
memset(Memory, 1, Flag_Memory * sizeof(int));
pthread_cond_broadcast(&Done_Malloc);
pthread_mutex_lock(&Lock);
pthread_cond_wait(&Never_Happens, &Lock);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&Lock);
/* NOTREACHED */
exit(1);
}
void emit_help(void)
{
fprintf(stderr, "Usage: usemem [-M|-m memory|-M -m mem] -t threads\n");
exit(EX_USAGE);
}
void *worker(void *unused)
{
unsigned long idx;
pthread_mutex_lock(&Lock);
pthread_cond_wait(&Done_Malloc, &Lock);
pthread_mutex_unlock(&Lock);
for (;;) {
// do not (much) care about modulo bias as most memory amounts will
// be vastly less than UINT64_MAX
idx = jkiss64_rand() % Flag_Memory;
Memory[idx] = (idx % 2 == 1)
? Memory[jkiss64_rand() % Flag_Memory]
: rand();
}
/* NOTREACHED */
}
相比之下，如果您请求的资源超出了可用空间，OpenBSD 就会导致 malloc 失败。