Debian 8.6 上的 Ghost NTP 服务器

Debian 8.6 上的 Ghost NTP 服务器

因此,大学 IT 安全团队和我一直在不停地讨论这个问题...任何人对此有任何想法:

我最近为我的实验室设置了一个小型文件服务器,在专用计算机上运行 Debian 8.6(Intel Avoton C2550 处理器——如果需要,很乐意提供更多硬件信息,但我认为没有必要)。 Debian安装没有任何问题,当时我还安装了Samba、NTP、ZFS和python。一切似乎运行良好,所以我让它在实验室的角落里运行了几个星期。

大约两周前,我收到了 IT 团队发来的一封电子邮件,其中称我的服务器已“受损”,并且容易被用于 NTP 放大/DDoS 攻击(使用 CVE-2013-5211 的 NTP 放大攻击,如中所述)https://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/alerts/TA14-013A)。他们指出的迹象是端口 123 上有大量 NTPv2 流量。奇怪的是,他们识别出的来自 ( *.*.*.233) 的 IP 地址与我的服务器配置并通过 ifconfig ( *.*.*.77) 报告的 IP 地址不同。尽管如此,一些基本的故障排除表明我的计算机确实在端口 123 上生成此流量(如 tcpdump 所示)。

这就是奇怪的地方开始的地方。我首先执行了针对 CVE-2013-5211 推荐的“修复”(既更新了 NTP 4.2.7 版本,又禁用了 monlist 功能)。两者都没有阻止交通流量。然后我尝试通过 IP 表阻止 UDP 123 端口:

$ /sbin/iptables -A INPUT -o eth0 -p udp --destination-port 123 -j DROP
$ /sbin/iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -p udp --destination-port 123 -j DROP

但这也对交通没有影响。我最终尝试从系统中清除 NTP,但这对流量也没有影响。截至今天下午,nmap 仍在报告:

Starting Nmap 5.51 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2016-12-19 16:15 EST
Nmap scan report for *.233
Host is up (0.0010s latency).
PORT    STATE SERVICE
123/udp open  ntp
| ntp-monlist:
|   Public Servers (2)
|       50.116.52.97    132.163.4.101
|   Public Clients (39)
|       54.90.159.15    185.35.62.119   185.35.62.233   185.35.63.86
|       54.197.89.98    185.35.62.142   185.35.62.250   185.35.63.108
|       128.197.24.176  185.35.62.144   185.35.62.251   185.35.63.128
|       180.97.106.37   185.35.62.152   185.35.63.15    185.35.63.145
|       185.35.62.27    185.35.62.159   185.35.63.27    185.35.63.146
|       185.35.62.52    185.35.62.176   185.35.63.30    185.35.63.167
|       185.35.62.65    185.35.62.186   185.35.63.34    185.35.63.180
|       185.35.62.97    185.35.62.194   185.35.63.38    185.35.63.183
|       185.35.62.106   185.35.62.209   185.35.63.39    185.35.63.185
|_      185.35.62.117   185.35.62.212   185.35.63.43

这很奇怪,因为 NTP 已经从系统中清除了几周。

在这条路上遇到了死胡同之后,我开始思考整个 IP 地址不匹配问题。我的计算机似乎同时位于 *.233 和 *.77 IP 上(通过在连接以太网电缆的情况下成功 ping 通这两个 IP 来确认,并且在拔掉电缆后两者均不可用),但 *.233 从未出现在 ifconfig 中:

Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr d0:XX:XX:51:78:XX  
inet addr:*.77  Bcast:*.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: X::X:X:X:787a/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
RX packets:23023571 errors:0 dropped:1362 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:364849 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
RX bytes:7441732389 (6.9 GiB)  TX bytes:44699444 (42.6 MiB)
Memory:df300000-df37ffff 

/etc/network/interfaces 中没有对 *.233 的引用,因此我看不到此 IP 分配来自何处。

所以,我有两个可能相关的问题,希望有人能帮助我:1)如何消除从我的服务器喷出的 NTP 流量,让 IT 摆脱我的困扰? 2) 我的服务器所在的第二个 IP 地址是怎么回事?我该如何删除它?

谢谢大家:)

更新:根据要求: $iptables -L -v -n

Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 57 packets, 6540 bytes)
 pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source               destination         

Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
 pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source               destination         

Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 27 packets, 2076 bytes)
 pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source               destination

$ip addr ls

1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default 
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 ::1/128 scope host 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether d0:50:99:51:78:7a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet *.77/24 brd *.255 scope global eth0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet *.167/24 brd *.255 scope global secondary dynamic eth0
       valid_lft 24612sec preferred_lft 24612sec
    inet6 X::X:X:X:787a/64 scope link 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
3: eth1: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/ether d0:50:99:51:78:7b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

更新 2:我没有提到,除了 IP 地址不匹配之外,MAC ID 也不匹配。这确实让我重新思考流量是否确实来自我的机器。但是:(1)将我的服务器从网络上拔掉会使流量消失; (2) 移动到不同的网络端口以及随后的流量; (3)tcpdump port 123显示异常流量:

13:24:33.329514 IP cumm024-0701-dhcp-233.bu.edu.ntp > 183.61.254.77.44300: NTPv2, Reserved, length 440
13:24:33.329666 IP cumm024-0701-dhcp-233.bu.edu.ntp > 183.61.254.77.44300: NTPv2, Reserved, length 440
13:24:33.329777 IP cumm024-0701-dhcp-233.bu.edu.ntp > 183.61.254.77.44300: NTPv2, Reserved, length 296

更新3: $ss -uapn 'sport = :123'

State      Recv-Q Send-Q                  Local Address:Port                    Peer Address:Port 

(即什么都没有)

$sudo cat /proc/net/dev

Inter-|   Receive                                                |  Transmit
 face |bytes    packets errs drop fifo frame compressed multicast|bytes    packets errs drop fifo colls carrier compressed
    lo:  327357    5455    0    0    0     0          0         0   327357    5455    0    0    0     0       0          0
  eth1:       0       0    0    0    0     0          0         0        0       0    0    0    0     0       0          0
  eth0: 13642399917 36270491    0 6522    0     0          0   2721337 45098276  368537    0    0    0     0       0          0

更新 4:这些数据包是几天前的典型数据包。今天(但是,仍然很高):

20:19:37.011762 IP cumm024-0701-dhcp-233.bu.edu.ntp > 103.56.63.147.26656: NTPv2, Reserved, length 152
20:19:37.011900 IP cumm024-0701-dhcp-233.bu.edu.ntp > 202.83.122.78.58066: NTPv2, Reserved, length 152
20:19:37.012036 IP cumm024-0701-dhcp-233.bu.edu.ntp > 103.56.63.147.17665: NTPv2, Reserved, length 152
20:19:37.014539 IP cumm024-0701-dhcp-233.bu.edu.ntp > 202.83.122.78.27945: NTPv2, Reserved, length 152
20:19:37.015482 IP cumm024-0701-dhcp-233.bu.edu.ntp > 202.83.122.78.42426: NTPv2, Reserved, length 152
20:19:37.015644 IP cumm024-0701-dhcp-233.bu.edu.ntp > 103.56.63.147.16086: NTPv2, Reserved, length 152

$ sudo ss -uapn '( sport = :42426 or dport = :42426 )'
State       Recv-Q Send-Q                                                        Local Address:Port                                                          Peer Address:Port 

是的,我可以 ping *.233 IP:

$ping 128.197.112.233
PING 128.197.112.233 (128.197.112.233) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 128.197.112.233: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.278 ms
64 bytes from 128.197.112.233: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.282 ms
64 bytes from 128.197.112.233: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.320 ms

不,MAC 不匹配 我的硬件 MAC 地址是:d0:50:99:51:78:7a 流量与 MAC 关联:bc:5f:f4:fe:a1:00

更新 5:根据要求,针对 *.233 进行端口扫描:

Starting Nmap 6.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2016-12-20 20:38 EET
NSE: Loaded 17 scripts for scanning.
Initiating SYN Stealth Scan at 20:38
Scanning cumm024-0701-dhcp-233.bu.edu (128.197.112.233) [1024 ports]
Discovered open port 22/tcp on 128.197.112.233
Completed SYN Stealth Scan at 20:38, 9.79s elapsed (1024 total ports)
Initiating Service scan at 20:38
Scanning 1 service on cumm024-0701-dhcp-233.bu.edu (128.197.112.233)
Completed Service scan at 20:38, 0.37s elapsed (1 service on 1 host)
Initiating OS detection (try #1) against cumm024-0701-dhcp-233.bu.edu (128.197.112.233)
Initiating Traceroute at 20:38
Completed Traceroute at 20:38, 0.10s elapsed
NSE: Script scanning 128.197.112.233.

[+] Nmap scan report for cumm024-0701-dhcp-233.bu.edu (128.197.112.233)
Host is up (0.083s latency).
Not shown: 1013 filtered ports

PORT    STATE  SERVICE VERSION
21/tcp  closed ftp
22/tcp  open   ssh     OpenSSH 5.5p1 Debian 6+squeeze1 (protocol 2.0)
23/tcp  closed telnet
25/tcp  closed smtp
43/tcp  closed whois
80/tcp  closed http
105/tcp closed unknown
113/tcp closed ident
210/tcp closed z39.50
443/tcp closed https
554/tcp closed rtsp

Device type: general purpose
Running: Linux 2.6.X
OS CPE: cpe:/o:linux:kernel:2.6
OS details: DD-WRT v24-sp2 (Linux 2.6.19)
Uptime guess: 45.708 days (since Sat Nov  5 03:39:36 2016)
Network Distance: 9 hops
TCP Sequence Prediction: Difficulty=204 (Good luck!)
IP ID Sequence Generation: All zeros
Service Info: OS: Linux; CPE: cpe:/o:linux:kernel


TRACEROUTE (using port 25/tcp)
HOP RTT      ADDRESS
1   0.95 ms  router1-lon.linode.com (212.111.33.229)
2   0.70 ms  109.74.207.0
3   1.09 ms  be4464.ccr21.lon01.atlas.cogentco.com (204.68.252.85)
4   1.00 ms  be2871.ccr42.lon13.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.58.185)
5   63.45 ms be2983.ccr22.bos01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.1.178)
6   63.60 ms TrusteesOfBostonUniversity.demarc.cogentco.com (38.112.23.118)
7   63.55 ms comm595-core-res01-gi2-3-cumm111-bdr-gw01-gi1-2.bu.edu (128.197.254.125)
8   63.61 ms cumm024-dist-aca01-gi5-2-comm595-core-aca01-gi2-2.bu.edu (128.197.254.206)
9   90.28 ms cumm024-0701-dhcp-233.bu.edu (128.197.112.233)

OS and Service detection performed. Please report any incorrect results at http://nmap.org/submit/ .

Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 20.73 seconds
           Raw packets sent: 557 (25.462KB) | Rcvd: 97 (8.560KB)

在 UDP 上:

Starting Nmap 6.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2016-12-20 20:44 EET
NSE: Loaded 17 scripts for scanning.
Initiating Ping Scan at 20:44
Scanning 128.197.112.233 [4 ports]
Completed Ping Scan at 20:44, 1.10s elapsed (1 total hosts)
Initiating UDP Scan at 20:44
Scanning cumm024-0701-dhcp-233.bu.edu (128.197.112.233) [1024 ports]
Completed UDP Scan at 20:44, 6.31s elapsed (1024 total ports)
Initiating Service scan at 20:44
Scanning 1024 services on cumm024-0701-dhcp-233.bu.edu (128.197.112.233)
Service scan Timing: About 0.39% done
Service scan Timing: About 3.12% done; ETC: 22:12 (1:25:46 remaining)
Service scan Timing: About 6.05% done; ETC: 21:53 (1:04:39 remaining)
Service scan Timing: About 8.98% done; ETC: 21:46 (0:56:03 remaining)
Discovered open port 123/udp on 128.197.112.233
Discovered open|filtered port 123/udp on cumm024-0701-dhcp-233.bu.edu (128.197.112.233) is actually open
Completed Service scan at 21:31, 2833.50s elapsed (1024 services on 1 host)
Initiating OS detection (try #1) against cumm024-0701-dhcp-233.bu.edu (128.197.112.233)
Retrying OS detection (try #2) against cumm024-0701-dhcp-233.bu.edu (128.197.112.233)
NSE: Script scanning 128.197.112.233.
Initiating NSE at 21:31
Completed NSE at 21:31, 10.02s elapsed

[+] Nmap scan report for cumm024-0701-dhcp-233.bu.edu (128.197.112.233)
Host is up (0.089s latency).
Not shown: 1023 open|filtered ports

PORT    STATE SERVICE VERSION
123/udp open  ntp?

1 service unrecognized despite returning data. If you know the service/version, please submit the following fingerprint at http://www.insecure.org/cgi-bin/servicefp-submit.cgi :
SF-Port123-UDP:V=6.00%I=7%D=12/20%Time=58597D5C%P=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
SF:%r(NTPRequest,30,"\xe4\x02\x04\xee\0\0\x8a\xff\0:t\xd9\x84\xa3\x04e\xdb
SF:\xcaeEX\xdbC'\xc5O#Kq\xb1R\xf3\xdc\x03\xfb\xb8\+>U\xab\xdc\x03\xfb\xb8\
SF:+T\xd1\xe9")%r(Citrix,C,"\xde\xc0\x010\x02\0\xa8\xe3\0\0\0\0");

Too many fingerprints match this host to give specific OS details
Network Distance: 9 hops

OS and Service detection performed. Please report any incorrect results at http://nmap.org/submit/ .

Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 2863.89 seconds
           Raw packets sent: 175 (6.720KB) | Rcvd: 50 (10.088KB)

答案1

这是带有 IPMI 的服务器级机器。导致问题的“幽灵”NTP 服务器在系统上的 BMC 处理器上运行,而不是在主 CPU 上运行。

答案2

正如已经说过的,您的 IPMI BMC(可能)是问题所在。如果您无法访问 IPMI 界面的 Web 界面或 ssh 界面,您可以尝试使用 Debian 安装上的 IPMI Tool 进行访问:

apt install ipmitool

安装后,您可以像这样将命令传递到 BMC(如果它位于端口 1):

ipmitool lan set 1 ipaddr 192.168.1.211

这是一个资源使用 IPMITool 进行 IPMI 网络配置man ipmitool如果你遇到困难,这总是一本好书……

您可以重置BMC如果你需要。

相关内容