等待进程完成或用户按下某个键

等待进程完成或用户按下某个键

我需要两种方法来终止 bash 脚本的一部分。

计数器达到预定义的数字,或者用户手动强制脚本继续使用计数器当前的值。

具体来说 - 我列出了 USB 驱动器。如果有 15 个,则对它们进行计数的函数将退出并且脚本可以继续。

我的代码看起来有点像这样:

scannew(){
    NEW=0
    OLD=$NEW
    while [ true ]; do
        # count the new drives
        lsblk -r > drives.new
        diff drives.old drives.new | grep disk | cut -d' ' -f 2 | sort > drives.all
        NEW=$(wc -l drives.all | cut -d' ' -f1)
        echo -en "   Detected drives: $NEW    \r"
        sleep 0.01
        if [ "$NEW" -eq "15" ]; then # exit if we reach the limit
            break
        fi
    done
}

# SOME CODE...

lsblk -r > drives.old

scannew & # start live device counter in the background
SCAN_PID=$! # remember it's PID
wait $SCAN_PID 2>/dev/null # wait until it dies
echo "It's on!"

# REST OF THE CODE...

我用该read命令尝试了各种东西,但结果是,脚本将始终等待读取退出(按 ENTER 后),并且我无法使“15 限制”条件覆盖它。

例如我尝试在函数中使用read -t而不是:sleepscannew()

scannew(){
    NEW=0
    OLD=$NEW
    while [ true ]; do

        # count the new drives
        lsblk -r > drives.new
        diff drives.old drives.new | grep disk | cut -d' ' -f 2 | sort > drives.all
        NEW=$(wc -l drives.all | cut -d' ' -f1)
        echo -en "   Detected drives: $NEW    \r"
        read -t 0.01 -n 1 && break # read instead of sleep
        if [ "$NEW" -eq "15" ]; then
            break
        fi
    done
}

但是 - 函数子进程似乎无法访问标准输入,并且使用read -t 0.01 -n 1 < /dev/stdin && break它也不起作用。

我怎样才能做到这一点?

答案1

首先我要说的是,你可以只是内联您在 中拥有的所有内容scannew,因为wait无论如何您都会 ing,除非您打算在脚本中的其他位置再次扫描。这实际上是您担心的呼叫wc可能会花费太长时间,如果确实如此,您可以终止它。这是一种简单的设置方法,trap它允许您捕获发送到进程的信号并为其设置自己的处理程序:

#! /usr/bin/env bash

# print a line just before we run our subshell, so we know when that happens
printf "Lets do something foolish...\n"

# trap SIGINT since it will be sent to the entire process group and we only
# want the subshell killed
trap "" SIGINT

# run something that takes ages to complete
BAD_IDEA=$( trap "exit 1" SIGINT; ls -laR / )

# remove the trap because we might want to actually terminate the script
# after this point
trap - SIGINT

# if the script gets here, we know only `ls` got killed
printf "Got here! Only 'ls' got killed.\n"

exit 0

但是,如果您想保留做事的方式,并将scannew函数作为后台作业运行,则需要做更多的工作。

由于您需要用户输入,因此正确的方法是使用read,但我们仍然需要脚本在scannew完成时继续运行,而不仅仅是永远等待用户输入。read使得这有点棘手,因为在允许s 处理信号bash之前等待当前命令完成。trap据我所知,在不重构整个脚本的情况下,唯一的解决方案是放入read一个while true循环并使用read -t 1.这样,该过程总是需要至少一秒钟才能完成,但在像您这样的情况下,您本质上想要运行列出 USB 设备的轮询守护程序,这可能是可以接受的。

#! /usr/bin/env bash

function slow_background_work {
    # condition can be anything of course
    # for testing purposes, we're just checking if the variable has anything in it
    while [[ -z $BAD_IDEA ]]
    do
        BAD_IDEA=$( ls -laR / 2>&1 | wc )
    done

    # `$$` normally gives us our own PID
    # but in a subshell, it is inherited and thus
    # gives the parent's PID
    printf "\nI'm done!\n"
    kill -s SIGUSR1 -- $$
    return 0
}

# trap SIGUSR1, which we're expecting from the background job
# once it's done with the work we gave it
trap "break" SIGUSR1

slow_background_work &

while true
do
    # rewinding the line with printf instead of the prompt string because
    # read doesn't understand backslash escapes in the prompt string
    printf "\r"
    # must check return value instead of the variable
    # because a return value of 0 always means there was
    # input of _some_ sort, including <enter> and <space>
    # otherwise, it's really tricky to test the empty variable
    # since read apparently defines it even if it doesn't get input
    read -st1 -n1 -p "prompt: " useless_variable && {
                              printf "Keypress! Quick, kill the background job w/ fire!\n"
                              # make sure we don't die as we kill our only child
                              trap "" SIGINT
                              kill -s SIGINT -- "$!"
                              trap - SIGINT
                              break
                            }
done

trap - SIGUSR1

printf "Welcome to the start of the rest of your script.\n"

exit 0

当然,如果您真正想要的是一个监视 USB 设备数量变化的守护进程或其他东西,您应该考虑systemd哪个可以提供更优雅的东西。

答案2

一个(某种程度上)通用的解决方案,用于运行给定的命令并在用户输入时终止它,否则退出。要点是在某种原始终端模式下执行读取,寻找“any”键,并通过子进程退出时应发送的信号来处理运行程序退出情况SIGCHLD(假设没有有趣的事情)子进程)。代码和文档(以及最终的测试)

#ifdef __linux__
#define _POSIX_SOURCE
#include <sys/types.h>
#endif

#include <err.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <getopt.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sysexits.h>
#include <termios.h>
#include <unistd.h>

int Flag_UserOkay;              // -U

struct termios Original_Termios;
pid_t Child_Pid;

void child_signal(int unused);
void emit_help(void);
void reset_term(void);

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
    int ch, status;
    char anykey;
    struct termios terminfo;

    while ((ch = getopt(argc, argv, "h?U")) != -1) {
        switch (ch) {
        case 'U':
            Flag_UserOkay = 1;
            break;
        case 'h':
        case '?':
        default:
            emit_help();
            /* NOTREACHED */
        }
    }
    argc -= optind;
    argv += optind;

    if (argc == 0)
        emit_help();

    if (!isatty(STDIN_FILENO))
        errx(1, "must have tty to read from");

    if (tcgetattr(STDIN_FILENO, &terminfo) < 0)
        err(EX_OSERR, "could not tcgetattr() on stdin");

    Original_Termios = terminfo;

    // cfmakeraw(3) is a tad too raw and influences output from child;
    // per termios(5) use "Case B" for quick "any" key reads with
    // canonical mode (line-based processing) and echo turned off.
    terminfo.c_cc[VMIN] = 1;
    terminfo.c_cc[VTIME] = 0;
    terminfo.c_lflag &= ~(ICANON | ECHO);

    tcsetattr(STDIN_FILENO, TCSAFLUSH, &terminfo);
    atexit(reset_term);

    signal(SIGCHLD, child_signal);

    Child_Pid = fork();

    if (Child_Pid == 0) {       // child
        close(STDIN_FILENO);
        signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_DFL);
        status = execvp(*argv, argv);
        warn("could not exec '%s' (%d)", *argv, status);
        _exit(EX_OSERR);

    } else if (Child_Pid > 0) { // parent
        if ((status = read(STDIN_FILENO, &anykey, 1)) < 0)
            err(EX_IOERR, "read() failed??");
        kill(Child_Pid, SIGTERM);

    } else {
        err(EX_OSERR, "could not fork");
    }

    exit(Flag_UserOkay ? 0 : 1);
}

void child_signal(int unused)
{
    // might try to pass along the exit status of the child, but that's
    // extra work and complication...
    exit(0);
}

void emit_help(void)
{
    fprintf(stderr, "Usage: waitornot [-U] command [args ..]\n");
    exit(EX_USAGE);
}

void reset_term(void)
{
    tcsetattr(STDIN_FILENO, TCSAFLUSH, &Original_Termios);
}

相关内容