在我的参考书目中,我引用了一次演讲,并引用了另一幅对第一次演讲中涉及的概念的卡通画。
我的解决方案是在文中引用这两个条目,并在卡通渲染的附录字段中添加参考:
@ONLINE{Pink2010,
author = {Daniel Pink},
title = {Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us},
url = {http://comment.rsablogs.org.uk/2010/04/08/rsa-animate-drive/},
addendum = {Versione cartoon di \cite{Pink2010a}}
}
@ONLINE{Pink2010a,
author = {Daniel Pink},
title = {Drive},
url = {http://www.thersa.org/events/vision/vision-videos/dan-pink-drive}
}
这是输入这些参考资料的正确方法吗?
答案1
实际上,这取决于您遵循的标准。但如果第二个版本(“卡通”)指向第一个直通crossref
字段,对我来说更有意义。所以你应该有
@Online{Main-ref,
author = {Author},
Title = {Title},
url = {url}
}
和
@online{Secondary-ref,
crossref = {Main-ref},
url = {new url},
addendum = {Explanation of the difference between the versions}
}