LyX 中 jurabib 输出的格式化问题

LyX 中 jurabib 输出的格式化问题

我在使用 jurabib 在 LyX 中创建脚注引文时遇到了问题。我按照设置 LyX 以使用 jurabib 的说明进行操作,请参阅http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/HumanitiesLyX

根据 wiki 建议,我在 LaTeX 序言中添加了以下文本(并应用了它)以实现牛津风格的格式:

\jurabibsetup{%
titleformat=italic,%
titleformat=commasep,%
commabeforerest,%
ibidem=strict,%
citefull=first,%
lookat,%
oxford,%
pages=format,%
idem%
}

这些格式似乎都没有真正应用于引文或参考书目输出。例如,标题不是斜体,后面也没有逗号。最后,我希望能够调整序言以使用芝加哥风格的脚注引文(并且参考书目格式也采用芝加哥风格)。

简短而普遍的问题是:如何才能使 LaTeX 序言中的 jurabibsetup 部分真正应用于文档输出?这是我的序言语法问题还是 BibTeX 条目格式问题?注意:我当前的参考书目采用 BibTeX 格式,并采用 jurabib 样式。我的参考书目 .bib 文件是从 Zotero 导出的。生成 pdf 输出时我没有收到任何错误消息……我只是没有得到我期望的输出。以下是我正在使用的 .bib 文件中的一些条目示例,因为我怀疑这可能是根本问题:

@incollection{lake_commitment_1998,
address = {Princeton, {N.J.}},
title = {Commitment Problems and the Spread of Ethnic Conflict},
isbn = {0691016917 (cloth alk. paper) 0691016909 (pbk. alk. paper)},
lccn = {Jefferson or Adams Bldg General or Area Studies Reading Rms GN496; .I595 1998 Main or Science/Business Reading Rms - STORED OFFSITE GN496; .I595 1998},
shorttitle = {Commitment Problems and the Spread of Ethnic Conflict},
url = {http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/prin031/97015031.html http://www.loc.gov/catdir/description/prin021/97015031.html},
booktitle = {The international spread of ethnic conflict : fear, diffusion, and escalation},
publisher = {Princeton University Press},
author = {Fearon, James D.},
editor = {Lake, David A. and Rothchild, Donald S.},
year = {1998},
keywords = {Conflict management., Ethnic conflict., International relations., World politics 1989-},
pages = {107--126},
annote = {{97015031David} A. Lake and Donald S. Rothchild, editors.ill. ; 25 {cm.Includes} bibliographical references (p. [351]-378) and index.},
annote = {The following values have no corresponding Zotero {field:SE} - 5}



@article{bates_organizing_2002,
title = {Organizing Violence},
volume = {46},
issn = {00220027},
shorttitle = {Organizing Violence},
url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/3176194},
abstract = {In stateless societies, coercion is privately provided; violence is employed to engage in, and to defend against, predation. At best, violence results in mere redistribution; being destructive, it more often results in a loss of social welfare. When organized, however, violence can be socially productive; it can be employed to defend property rights, thereby strengthening the incentives to engage in productive activity. To explore how violence can be rendered a source of welfare, the authors develop a model of a stateless society in which people's rights to the product of their labor are secure only if they possess coercive capabilities. Using case materials and formal logic, the authors then compare this outcome with that obtained when private agents reward specialists in violence for defending property rights. In doing so, we plumb the role of the state.},
journal = {The Journal of Conflict Resolution},
author = {Bates, Robert and Greif, Avner and Singh, Smita},
year = {2002},
note = {5},
pages = {599--628},
annote = {{ArticleType:} primary\_article / Full publication date: Oct., 2002 / Copyright © 2002 Sage Publications, Inc.}

},

相关内容