我对枚举有一个问题。在命题“内部”进行枚举和在证明“内部”进行枚举时,项目的符号看起来不同。
代码
\documentclass[11pt,a5paperfootinclude=true,headinclude=true]{scrbook} % KOMA-Script book
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{lipsum}
\usepackage[linedheaders,parts,pdfspacing]{classicthesis} % ,manychapters
\usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign}
%\usepackage[osf]{libertine}
\titleformat{\section}
{\normalfont\bfseries}{\thesection}{1em}{}
\usepackage{amsthm}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{multicol}
\usepackage{IEEEtrantools}
\usepackage{anysize}
\marginsize{0.1\paperwidth}{0.1\paperheight}{2cm}{2cm}
\newcommand{\bigslant}[2]{{\raisebox{.2em}{$#1$}\left/\raisebox{-.2em}{$#2$}\right.}}
\usepackage{enumerate}
\begin{document}
\theoremstyle{plain}
\newtheorem{thm}{Theorem}[chapter] % reset theorem numbering for each chapter
\theoremstyle{definition}
\newtheorem{defn}[thm]{Definition} % definition numbers are dependent on theorem numbers
\newtheorem{exmp}[thm]{Example}
\theoremstyle{corollary}
\newtheorem{cor}[thm]{Corollary}
\theoremstyle{lemma}
\newtheorem{lem}[thm]{Lemma}
\theoremstyle{proposition}
\newtheorem{prop}[thm]{Proposition}
\newcommand{\ndiv}{\hspace{-4pt}\not|\hspace{2pt}}
\begin{prop}
\begin{enumerate}[(a)] % (a), (b), (c), ...
\item
\item
\end{enumerate}
\end{prop}
\begin{proof}
\begin{enumerate}[(a)] % (a), (b), (c), ...
\item
\item
\end{enumerate}
\end{proof}
\end{document}
结果
有没有什么办法可以解决这个问题,让它们看起来一模一样,还是说这是不可能的?我们也可以引用枚举项吗?
谢谢
答案1
我会使用enumitem
比这更灵活的包,enumerate
并为定理和证明中的这种枚举定义一个新环境。
\documentclass[11pt,a5paper,footinclude=true,headinclude=true]{scrbook} % KOMA-Script book
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[linedheaders,parts,pdfspacing]{classicthesis} % ,manychapters
\usepackage[bitstream-charter]{mathdesign}
\usepackage{lipsum}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsthm}
\usepackage{enumitem}
\theoremstyle{plain}
\newtheorem{thm}{Theorem}[chapter] % reset theorem numbering for each chapter
\newtheorem{cor}[thm]{Corollary}
\newtheorem{lem}[thm]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{prop}[thm]{Proposition}
\theoremstyle{definition}
\newtheorem{defn}[thm]{Definition} % definition numbers are dependent on theorem numbers
\newtheorem{exmp}[thm]{Example}
\newenvironment{roster}
{\begin{enumerate}[font=\upshape,label=(\alph*)]}
{\end{enumerate}}
\begin{document}
\begin{prop}
\begin{roster}
\item Something
\item Something else
\end{roster}
\end{prop}
\begin{proof}
\begin{roster}
\item Easy
\item The same\qedhere
\end{roster}
\end{proof}
\end{document}
请注意,定理声明应该放在前面\begin{document}
,并且你正在使用不存在的样式。我删除了不必要的部分。
要在枚举内结束证明,请使用\qedhere
,这样墓碑将被放在最后一行。
答案2
您可以将项目标签设置为[\upshape (a)]
而不是[(a)]
。请注意\textup{(a)}
不适用于enumarate
包,因为占位符a
隐藏在组中{...}
。
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsthm,enumerate}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\begin{document}
\begin{theorem}
This has two parts.
\begin{enumerate}[\upshape (a)]
\item First part.
\item Second part.
\end{enumerate}
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
Also two parts to the proof.
\begin{enumerate}[\upshape (a)]
\item Proof of first part.
\item Proof of second part.
\end{enumerate}
\end{proof}
\end{document}
答案3
与 类似的解决方案enumitem
,但强调交叉引用within a theorem environment works with enumitem, while it did not with
枚举. I also loaded the
cleverref` 包中的项目,因为它允许不键入被引用的对象类型,而只键入其标签 - 这样,如果定理在后来的版本中变成命题,则不必进行搜索和替换。
\documentclass[11pt,a5paperfootinclude=true,headinclude=true]{scrbook} % KOMA-Script book
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{lmodern}
\usepackage{titlesec}
\titleformat{\section} {\normalfont\bfseries}{\thesection}{1em}{}
\usepackage{amsthm}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage[shortlabels]{enumitem}
\usepackage{cleveref}
\theoremstyle{plain}
\newtheorem{thm}{Theorem}[chapter] % reset theorem numbering for each chapter
\theoremstyle{definition}
\newtheorem{defn}[thm]{Definition} % definition numbers are dependent on theorem numbers \newtheorem{exmp}[thm]{Example}
\newtheorem{cor}[thm]{Corollary}
\newtheorem{lem}[thm]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{prop}[thm]{Proposition}
\begin{document}
\begin{prop}\label{pr1}
\begin{enumerate}[\upshape(a)] % (a), (b), (c), ...
\item \label{item1} Once upon a time…
\item So what?
\end{enumerate}
\end{prop}
\begin{proof} \begin{enumerate}[(a)] % (a), (b), (c), ...
\item According to \cref{pr1}\ref{item1}
\item What else? \qedhere
\end{enumerate}
\end{proof}
\end{document}