我应该如何重新排列这些项目符号，使它们更美观？

Question

我在一篇两列文章中有以下 tex 代码。

The multi-faceted evaluation scheme is defined as follows:

\begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*, noitemsep]
\item \textbf{Structural Measures}
    \begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*,noitemsep]
    \item \textbf{$\vert$V$\vert$}: \# distinct vertices, 
    \item \textbf{$\vert$E$\vert$}: \# distinct edges
    \item \textbf{\#c.c}: \# connected components, 
    \item \textbf{cycles}: whether the taxonmy is a Directed Acyclic Graph or the taxonomy contains cycles
    \end{itemize}   
\item \textbf{Comparison against Gold Standards}
    \begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*,noitemsep]
    \item \textbf{\#VC}: \# vectices in common with gold standard
    \item \textbf{\%VC}: vertex coverage (i.e. proportion of gold standard vertices covered by system)
    \item \textbf{\#EC}: \# edges in common with gold standard
    \item \textbf{\%EC}: edge coverage (i.e. proportion of gold standard edges covered by system)
    \item \textbf{:NE}: ratio of novel edges 
    \item \textbf{F\&M}: Cummulative  Fowlkes \& Mallows Measure (Fowlkes and Mallows, 1983; Velardi, 2013)
    \end{itemize}
\end{itemize}

它输出如下内容：

由于两列文章的空间限制，逐项列出这个条目确实非常丑陋，尤其是其中包含的所有术语和缩写。

我应该如何重新排列这些项目符号，使它们更美观？

---

#我尝试通过no. of像这样替换来减少缩写

The multi-faceted evaluation scheme is defined as follows:

\begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*, noitemsep]
\item \textbf{Structural Measures}
    \begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*,noitemsep]
    \item \textbf{$\vert$V$\vert$}: no. of distinct vertices, 
    \item \textbf{$\vert$E$\vert$}: no. of distinct edges
    \item \textbf{\#c.c}: no. of connected components, 
    \item \textbf{cycles}: whether the taxonmy is a Directed Acyclic Graph or the taxonomy contains cycles
    \end{itemize}   
\item \textbf{Comparison against Gold Standards}
    \begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*,noitemsep]
    \item \textbf{\#VC}: no. of vectices in common with gold standard
    \item \textbf{\%VC}: vertex coverage (i.e. proportion of gold standard vertices covered by system)
    \item \textbf{\#EC}: no. of edges in common with gold standard
    \item \textbf{\%EC}: edge coverage (i.e. proportion of gold standard edges covered by system)
    \item \textbf{:NE}: ratio of novel edges 
    \item \textbf{F\&M}: Cummulative  Fowlkes \& Mallows Measure (Fowlkes and Mallows, 1983; Velardi, 2013)
    \end{itemize}
\end{itemize}

并且空间问题更加严重：

Answer 1

对于这些类型的列表，我喜欢使用名称\item作为右对齐的可选“项目符号”。

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{enumitem}

\begin{document}

\begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*, noitemsep]
\item \textbf{Structural Measures}
    \begin{itemize}[leftmargin=1.3cm,noitemsep]
    \item [\textbf{$\vert$V$\vert$}:] \# distinct vertices, 
    \item [\textbf{$\vert$E$\vert$}:] \# distinct edges
    \item [\textbf{\#c.c}:] \# connected components, 
    \item [\textbf{cycles}:] whether the taxonmy is a Directed Acyclic Graph or the taxonomy contains cycles
    \end{itemize}   
\item \textbf{Comparison against Gold Standards}
    \begin{itemize}[leftmargin=1.3cm,noitemsep]
    \item [\textbf{\#VC}:] \# vectices in common with gold standard
    \item [\textbf{\%VC}:] vertex coverage (i.e. proportion of gold standard vertices covered by system)
    \item [\textbf{\#EC}:] \# edges in common with gold standard
    \item [\textbf{\%EC}:] edge coverage (i.e. proportion of gold standard edges covered by system)
    \item [\textbf{:NE}:] ratio of novel edges 
    \item [\textbf{F\&M}:] Cummulative  Fowlkes \& Mallows Measure (Fowlkes and Mallows, 1983; Velardi, 2013)
    \end{itemize}
\end{itemize}

\end{document}