我正在使用经典论文模板撰写我的论文。
我喜欢在论文中只用一部分来阐述假设，即不包含章节的部分。这部分有 3 页长。
一切似乎都正常，但目录中该部分的条目指向的是目录的最后一页而不是第一页。有人知道如何修复这个问题吗？
非常感谢，Merijn
下面是该部件的简单概述。为了便于阅读，我删去了文本，但该部件总共有 3 页长：
%PART THESIS HYPOTHESIS
%-------------------------------------------------------------------------
\ctparttext{
\thispagestyle{plain}
here is one page of text..
\pagebreak
\thispagestyle{plain}
here is text, and a figure.
\pagebreak
\thispagestyle{plain}
here is one new page of text..
}
\part{Thesis Hypothesis: blablabla ...}
%-------------------------------------------------------------------------
编辑：
我觉得我更接近问题了。我添加了一个包含 3 页的部分。中间一页包含一个图表。
目录中注明的页码是该部分的最后一页。如果单击目录中的页码，则会跳转到该部分第二页中的图表。当我删除该图表时，条目会正确指向第一页的顶部，单击它也会跳转到正确的位置。显然，在该部分中添加图表会搞乱目录。我检查了一下，该部分中的\pagebreak插入内容似乎不是问题的原因。
有人知道如何解决这个问题吗？要重现此问题：-需要加载最新的classicthesis包 -注释掉 -cftpagenumbersoff{part}在classicthesis.sty
文件中classicthesis添加\part我在下面输入的内容。显然我无法附加我的 latex 文件。
这重现了这个问题。如果去掉方程和数字，问题又解决了。
\ctparttext{
\thispagestyle{plain}
Investigating the hypothesis on the realisation of gluon saturation is of paramount importance for our fundamental understanding of Nature. Over 99\% of the mass of the visible matter in our universe is effectively generated by QCD, and saturation may elegantly account for this. For the latter, the large number of small-$x$ gluons are envisaged as a classical background field. Due to this background field the high-$x$ partons become inert. Furthermore, gluon saturation is expected to tame the exponential growth of the gluon pdf, and thus prevent the occurrence of a unitarity violation in the QCD description of hadronic interactions. Besides, gluon saturation is an important theoretical ingredient for formulating predictions on the initial state of heavy ion collisions, which constitute a core research program at the LHC. Also, cosmic-ray studies may directly benefit from improved modelling of the low-x content of hadrons (as was shown for the ultra-forward LHCf measurement in Fig.~\ref{fig:LHCComparisonrcBK}). Precision measurements of the Brout-Englert-Higgs boson may furthermore indirectly benefit from saturation studies, since the latter may constrain the uncertainty on the gluon pdf. Since gluon fusion is the dominant production mechanism of the scalar boson at the LHC, an improvement in the gluon pdf uncertainty would certainly not be of modest importance.
These core arguments elucidate why, since non-linear parton evolution was hypothesised over two decades ago~\cite{DGLAP:Gribov}, saturation has been at the focal point of the theoretical and experimental community. So far, numerous papers have been presented on the topic. Models incorporating saturation have been confronted with a wealth of data, spanning nearly three decades of particle physics experiments. A central incentive for the recent proton-lead collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=$5 and 8 TeV at the LHC is the search for signals of gluon saturation. Ambitions for the future include the foreseen construction of an electron-ion collider; a pivotal argument for this endeavour is a precision measurement of saturation in a heavy ion~\cite{EIC,LHeC}.
\pagebreak
\thispagestyle{plain}
Optimal sensitivity to probe gluon saturation may be achieved by measuring low-pt jets in the forward direction. This statement can be motivated straightforwardly, since in a hard-parton interaction the $x$-value of the parton can, to leading order, be reconstructed from the kinematical properties of the resulting jet via:
\begin{equation}
x=\frac{p_{t} e^{-|\eta|}}{\sqrt{s}}.
\end{equation}
We succinctly derive the relation in appendix~\ref{Appendix:Kinematics} for completeness.
Concluding, forward low-pt jets probe the hadron at low-$x$, where the effects of saturation are strongest.
In Fig.~\ref{fig:AcceptanceLHCexperiments} (left) we depict the acceptances of the large LHC experiments, adapted to 5TeV proton-lead collisions with the proton boosted in the negative direction; the acceptances are depicted in the proton-nucleon centre-of-mass system. The plot is complemented with the existing HERA measurements, and parameterisations of the saturation scale in a proton and lead ion are overlaid.
\thispagestyle{plain}%important to remove an undesired header
\begin{figure}[bth]
\begin{center}
%\includegraphics[width=.42\linewidth]{Graphics/PartHypothesis/LHC_CASTOR_QCDAcceptance_pA_IncKS.pdf}
%\includegraphics[width=.56\linewidth]{Graphics/PartHypothesis/AllModelsOnly.pdf}
\caption{Left: the acceptances of the large LHC experiments. These have been adjusted to the centre-of-mass system of a 5TeV proton-lead collision, with the proton towards CASTOR. The kinematic regime of the HERA measurements is overlaid. The collinearly improved proton saturation scale has been parameterised as $Q_{s}(x=)ce^{\lambda/x}$. We fixed $\lambda$ to 0.3~\cite{VirtualityEvoinHighDensityArticle}. Given the slope parameter, we adjusted $Q_{s}^{2}(p)$ to 0.36 at $x=0.01$~\cite{HeraFitAAMS}. The nuclear saturation scale $Q_{s}^{2}(p)$ is enhanced with a factor $A^{1/3}=5.9$ w.r.t.\,the proton saturation scale. The parameterisation of the KS saturation scales were obtained in a private communication. Right: predictions for the single-inclusive jet energy spectrum in CASTOR based on the AAMQS and KS analyses. MV refers to the McLerran-Venugopalan model, '01 to the second parameterisation from table 1 of~\cite{LHCComparisonAAMQS}, while '19 refers to the third parameterisation}
\label{fig:AcceptanceLHCexperiments}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
The CMS experiment at the LHC has been equipped with the CASTOR calorimeter, which extends the range in which jets can be measured (in the lab frame) to $-6.6<\eta<-5.2$ (CASTOR is only installed at one side of the CMS experiment). This calorimeter can measure very low pt jets, the minimal pt values presented in this analysis correspond to ${\approx}3$GeV.
\pagebreak
\thispagestyle{plain}
A study of jets in CASTOR in proton-lead collisions at the unrivalled centre-of-mass energies of the LHC thus possesses unique sensitivity to non-linear evolution effects.
Evidently, such an analysis would overcome the adversities that obscured the conclusions in the HERA and RHIC analyses. The nuclear saturation scale for $\sqrt{s}=5TeV$ p+Pb collisions in the CASTOR acceptance is expected to be around $10GeV$; this is well above the pertubative limit $\Lambda_{QCD}^{2}$. Furthermore, a jet with a pt of 3GeV may be caused by a \textit{hard} parton with an $x$-value of ${\approx}0.25$. Thus, the fragmentation functions are not evaluated at the kinematic limit $x\rightarrow1$.
In Fig.~\ref{fig:AcceptanceLHCexperiments} (right) we present predictions for the single-inclusive jet-energy spectrum \footnote{The single inclusive jet spectrum can easily be related to the single inclusive particle spectrum by clustering the particles with a jet algorithm} in the CASTOR acceptance n 5TeV proton-lead collisions, based on the KS and AAMQS fits to HERA e+p data. It can be observed that the KS and MRW predictions for linear and non-linear parton evolution lead to very distinct solutions, which differ more than an order of magnitude at low jet energies. The AAMQS fits give very similar results for the the g'01 and g'19 parameterisation, while the MV model has a different slope.
Concluding, the CASTOR single-inclusive jet spectrum constitutes indeed a very powerful observable to scrutinise hypotheses on saturation.
Given all the advantages and benefits of an analysis of jets in CASTOR in proton-lead collisions, such a study is on the other hand certainly not free of complications and obstacles. The CASTOR calorimeter was originally not designed to measure jets, which induces various afflictions (which will be extensively reviewed). In spite of various endeavours to study CASTOR jets in p+p collisions, this is the first CASTOR jet analysis that is in the process of submission to a journal. Given the experimental state-of-the-art, this thesis therefore targets two objectives: proving the experimental validity of CASTOR jets, and ultimately exploiting these to probe saturation.
}
\part{Thesis Hypothesis: an unprecedented experimental search for signals of saturation}%\label{Part:saturation}%tried to assign a label, didn't solve it.
%----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%ADDITION PART MERIJN ENDS
答案1
\part我最终设法通过以下方式解决了包含多页的片段的问题：这pagestyle{clean}是为了避免将最后一章的标题打印在页面上方。我\pagebreak仍然需要在合适的地方，也许有更好的解决方法。
在经典论文中，这对我有用，目录中的条目指向正确的页面，如果单击它，则会指向该部分的标题（而不是文本中的公式或图片）。再次感谢您的评论！
{
\let\newpage\relax
\makeatletter
\titlespacing*{\part}
{\z@}
{\z@}
{\z@}
\makeatother
\part{Here give the title of the part}
}
\thispagestyle{plain}
first of page text..
\pagebreak
\thispagestyle{plain}
Second page of text...
%before a new \part starts apply:
\cleardoublepage