![对齐环境中的水平盒子过满-我该如何断线?](https://linux22.com/image/370240/%E5%AF%B9%E9%BD%90%E7%8E%AF%E5%A2%83%E4%B8%AD%E7%9A%84%E6%B0%B4%E5%B9%B3%E7%9B%92%E5%AD%90%E8%BF%87%E6%BB%A1-%E6%88%91%E8%AF%A5%E5%A6%82%E4%BD%95%E6%96%AD%E7%BA%BF%EF%BC%9F.png)
我正在尝试创建一个合乎逻辑的论点,但是我得到了水平盒子过满的错误。
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath, amsthm, amssymb, amsfonts}
\begin{align*}
P1\text{*}: & \quad \text{P1 is a mathematical abstraction of distance.} \\
P2\text{*}: & \quad \text{P2 is a statement regarding distances in the physical world.} \\
P3\text{*}: & \quad \text{The physical world requires a resolution to distinguish distance, while mathematics can use any resolution.} \\
C1\text{*}: & \quad \text{Therefore, Zeno's argument is flawed.}
\end{align*}
我想在“物理世界需要分辨率来区分距离,而数学可以使用任何分辨率。”这句话的逗号处拆分行,但我该怎么做呢?谢谢!
答案1
tabularx
使用or有两种可能性itemize
:
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\begin{document}
\noindent
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{l<:X}
P1* & P1 is a mathematical abstraction of distance.\\
P2* & P2 is a statement regarding distances in the physical world. \\
P3* & The physical world requires a resolution to distinguish distance, while mathematics can use any resolution. \\
C1 & Therefore, Zeno's argument is flawed.
\end{tabularx}
\begin{itemize}
\item[P1*:] P1 is a mathematical abstraction of distance.
\item [P2*:] P2 is a statement regarding distances in the physical world.
\item[P3*:] The physical world requires a resolution to distinguish distance, while mathematics can use any resolution.
\item[C1:] Therefore, Zeno's argument is flawed.
\end{itemize}
\end{document}
答案2
使用description
环境和包enumitem
:
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage[showframe]{geometry}
\usepackage{enumitem}
\begin{document}
\begin{description}[font = \normalfont, labelwidth=1cm, leftmargin=!, itemsep=2pt]
\item[P1\textsuperscript{*}:] P1 is a mathematical abstraction of distance.
\item[P2\textsuperscript{*}:] P2 is a statement regarding distances in the physical world. distinguish distance, while mathematics can use any resolution.
\item[P3\textsuperscript{*}:] The physical world requires a resolution to distinguish distance, while mathematics can use any resolution.
\item[C1\textsuperscript{*}:] Therefore, Zeno's argument is flawed.
\end{description}
\end{document}