\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{geometry,tabularx,ragged2e,booktabs}
\usepackage{amssymb,multirow,graphicx} % <-- new
\newcolumntype{L}{>{\RaggedRight\arraybackslash}X}
\usepackage[skip=0.333\baselineskip]{caption}
\begin{document}
\begin{table}[htbp]
\caption{Literature Review on Personality in Software Engineering}
\label{tab:a}
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{|*{7}{l|} *{3}{L|}}
\hline
Ref & \multicolumn{6}{c|}{Model Used}
& Approach & Limitation & Goal \\
\hline
& \parbox[t]{2mm}{\multirow{3}{*}{\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{MBTI}}}
& \parbox[t]{2mm}{\multirow{3}{*}{\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{FFM}}}
& \parbox[t]{2mm}{\multirow{3}{*}{\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{BFI}}}
& \parbox[t]{2mm}{\multirow{3}{*}{\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{KTS}}}
& \parbox[t]{2mm}{\multirow{3}{*}{\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{BTR}}}
&\parbox[t]{2mm}{\multirow{3}{*}{\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{NEO-FFI}}}
& \multicolumn{3}{L|}{} \\[7ex]
\hline
[10] & & &\checkmark & & &
& Interactive personality profiling approach
& Test were based on subjective evidences which may lead to uncertainty.
& In order to propose a structure for effective software team structure. \\
\hline
[20] & & & & & &\checkmark
& Quasi-Experiment
& This study is conducted with students which leads to ambiguity on difference in nature of students and software engineers.
& To study the product quality, team climate and Satisfaction of software engineers. \\
\hline
[23] & &\checkmark & & & &
& Empirical Study
& The limitation of the study is that the questions used to examine software engineer's preference do not provide details about software engineers.
& To find out influences among the emotional intelligence and work preferences. \\
\hline
[24] & & &\checkmark & & &
& OR mathematical programming formulation.
& The proposed approach is worthy in medium and small number of groups and teams. As number of groups and projects increases the proposed approach outperform.
& This study focuses on Multiple Team Formation Problem (MTFP).The proposed approach focuses on allocating multiple people to multiple groups or teams. \\
\hline
[25] & & & &\checkmark & &
& Empirical Study
& They have studied the personalities of undergraduate students in pair programming which might lead to wrong results as undergraduate students and software engineers have difference in term of personalities.
& o study the effect of developers personalities and nature on pair programming.\\
\hline
[25] & & & &\checkmark & &
& Empirical Study
& They have studied the personalities of undergraduate students in pair programming which might lead to wrong results as undergraduate students and software engineers have difference in term of personalities.
& o study the effect of developers personalities and nature on pair programming.\\
\hline
[25] & & & &\checkmark & &
& Empirical Study
& They have studied the personalities of undergraduate students in pair programming which might lead to wrong results as undergraduate students and software engineers have difference in term of personalities.
& o study the effect of developers personalities and nature on pair programming.\\
\hline
[25] & & & &\checkmark & &
& Empirical Study
& They have studied the personalities of undergraduate students in pair programming which might lead to wrong results as undergraduate students and software engineers have difference in term of personalities.
& o study the effect of developers personalities and nature on pair programming.\\
\hline
[25] & & & &\checkmark & &
& Empirical Study
& They have studied the personalities of undergraduate students in pair programming which might lead to wrong results as undergraduate students and software engineers have difference in term of personalities.
& o study the effect of developers personalities and nature on pair programming.\\
\hline
[25] & & & &\checkmark & &
& Empirical Study
& They have studied the personalities of undergraduate students in pair programming which might lead to wrong results as undergraduate students and software engineers have difference in term of personalities.
& o study the effect of developers personalities and nature on pair programming.\\
\hline
\end{tabularx}
\end{table}
\end{document}
答案1
根据设计，table环境tabularx不能跨越超过一页。我建议您加载longtable包并使用longtable环境。
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{geometry,longtable,ragged2e}
\usepackage{array,amssymb,multirow,graphicx} % <-- new
\newcolumntype{P}[1]{>{\RaggedRight\arraybackslash}p{#1\textwidth}}
\usepackage[skip=0.333\baselineskip]{caption}
\begin{document}
\setlength{\extrarowheight}{2pt}
\begin{longtable}{|*{7}{l|} *{3}{P{0.19}|}} % "0.19": found by trial and error
%% header and footer blocks
\caption{Literature Review on Personality in Software Engineering} \label{tab:a} \\
\hline
Ref & \multicolumn{6}{c|}{Model Used}
& Approach & Limitation & Goal \\
\hline
&\parbox[t]{2mm}{\multirow{3}{*}{\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{MBTI}}}
&\parbox[t]{2mm}{\multirow{3}{*}{\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{FFM}}}
&\parbox[t]{2mm}{\multirow{3}{*}{\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{BFI}}}
&\parbox[t]{2mm}{\multirow{3}{*}{\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{KTS}}}
&\parbox[t]{2mm}{\multirow{3}{*}{\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{BTR}}}
&\parbox[t]{2mm}{\multirow{3}{*}{\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{NEO-FFI}}}
&\multicolumn{3}{c|}{} \\[7ex]
\hline
\endfirsthead
\multicolumn{7}{@{}l}{Table \ref{tab:a}, continued}\\[1ex]
\hline
Ref & \multicolumn{6}{c|}{Model Used}
& Approach & Limitation & Goal \\
\hline
&\parbox[t]{2mm}{\multirow{3}{*}{\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{MBTI}}}
&\parbox[t]{2mm}{\multirow{3}{*}{\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{FFM}}}
&\parbox[t]{2mm}{\multirow{3}{*}{\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{BFI}}}
&\parbox[t]{2mm}{\multirow{3}{*}{\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{KTS}}}
&\parbox[t]{2mm}{\multirow{3}{*}{\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{BTR}}}
&\parbox[t]{2mm}{\multirow{3}{*}{\rotatebox[origin=c]{90}{NEO-FFI}}}
&\multicolumn{3}{c|}{} \\[7ex]
\hline
\endhead
\multicolumn{10}{r@{}}{\footnotesize\em Continued on following page}\\
\endfoot
\hline
\endlastfoot
%% body of longtable
[10] & & &\checkmark & & &
& Interactive personality profiling approach
& Test were based on subjective evidences which may lead to uncertainty.
& In order to propose a structure for effective software team structure. \\
\hline
[20] & & & & & &\checkmark
& Quasi-Experiment
& This study is conducted with students which leads to ambiguity on difference in nature of students and software engineers.
& To study the product quality, team climate and Satisfaction of software engineers. \\
\hline
[23] & &\checkmark & & & &
& Empirical Study
& The limitation of the study is that the questions used to examine software engineer's preference do not provide details about software engineers.
& To find out influences among the emotional intelligence and work preferences. \\
\hline
[24] & & &\checkmark & & &
& OR mathematical programming formulation.
& The proposed approach is worthy in medium and small number of groups and teams. As number of groups and projects increases the proposed approach outperform.
& This study focuses on Multiple Team Formation Problem (MTFP)\@. The proposed approach focuses on allocating multiple people to multiple groups or teams. \\
\hline
[25] & & & &\checkmark & &
& Empirical Study
& They have studied the personalities of undergraduate students in pair programming which might lead to wrong results as undergraduate students and software engineers have difference in term of personalities.
& o study the effect of developers personalities and nature on pair programming.\\
\hline
[25] & & & &\checkmark & &
& Empirical Study
& They have studied the personalities of undergraduate students in pair programming which might lead to wrong results as undergraduate students and software engineers have difference in term of personalities.
& o study the effect of developers personalities and nature on pair programming.\\
\hline
[25] & & & &\checkmark & &
& Empirical Study
& They have studied the personalities of undergraduate students in pair programming which might lead to wrong results as undergraduate students and software engineers have difference in term of personalities.
& o study the effect of developers personalities and nature on pair programming.\\
\hline
[25] & & & &\checkmark & &
& Empirical Study
& They have studied the personalities of undergraduate students in pair programming which might lead to wrong results as undergraduate students and software engineers have difference in term of personalities.
& o study the effect of developers personalities and nature on pair programming.\\
\hline
[25] & & & &\checkmark & &
& Empirical Study
& They have studied the personalities of undergraduate students in pair programming which might lead to wrong results as undergraduate students and software engineers have difference in term of personalities.
& o study the effect of developers personalities and nature on pair programming.\\
\hline
[25] & & & &\checkmark & &
& Empirical Study
& They have studied the personalities of undergraduate students in pair programming which might lead to wrong results as undergraduate students and software engineers have difference in term of personalities.
& o study the effect of developers personalities and nature on pair programming.\\
\end{longtable}
\end{document}