我不知道为什么，但natbib似乎不起作用。当我编译较旧的 .txt 时，它会出错。我有一个 file.txt 可以编译我已有的参考书目（我将其用作基础），但我本周插入的新参考资料没有被编译。我不知道这是为什么。
\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{tikz-qtree}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage[a4paper]{geometry}
\geometry{top=2.5cm, bottom=2.5cm, left=2.5cm, right=2.5cm}
\usepackage{graphics}
\newcommand{\squeezeup}{\vspace{-50.5mm}}
\usepackage{float}
\restylefloat{table}
\let\olditemize\itemize
\def\itemize{\olditemize\itemsep=0pt }
\usepackage{enumitem}
\setlist[enumerate]{noitemsep}
\usepackage{natbib}
\bibliographystyle{apalike}
\usepackage[pagewise]{lineno}
\title{A contemporary approach to \cite{vendlerEachEveryAny1962}}
\author{\vspace{-5ex}
Word-count:2887}
\date{\vspace{-4ex}}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
\begin{abstract}
In this discussion note, we will provide some contemporary remarks \cite{vendlerEachEveryAny1962}. We will propose that his characterization of the Free Choice Item \textit{any} can be properly explained if we take into account an alternative semantics framework. We will assume with \cite{menendez-benitoUniversalFreeChoice2010} that it is a universal indeterminate pronoun, and with \cite{aloniFreeChoiceExhaustification2007} that it involves an \textbf{exhaustification} operator to explain its behaviour. We will show that, if we take into account this approach, we will be able to explain what Vendler called \textit{freedom of choice, lack of existential import, lawlike propositions}, among other characteristics. In addition, we will try to do some linguistics in philosophy, and try to explain how a proper understanding of FCI may help to better understand some reference related problems?
\end{abstract}
\section{Introduction}
\cite{vendlerEachEveryAny1974} intended to show that a proper linguistic analysis of quantificational expressions could help in the formalization of natural language and in understanding reference, existential import, and lawlike generalizations. He tried to show that \textit{each, every, all} and \textit{any} did not have the same universal meaning. Even though his analysis was properly linguistic, he intended to provide an empirical basis for some of the traditional problems of analytic philosophy. In this note, we will show that an alternative semantics framework can account for his insights on the Free Choice Item \textit{any}, and try to show that we can learn something about non referential expressions if we take into account the linguistic behaviour of Free Choice Items (FCI).
(...)
We have defended that reference is not at stake when FCI are taken into account, because they involve quantification. Nonetheless, we have shown that the semantics of FCI has a repercussion on the use that different speech acts involving FCI have. In the case of assertions, not only are speakers commited to the truth of the asserted propositions, but to their freedom of choice. In the case of permissions, not only is there a perlocucionary effect, but the speaker signals the hearar that she may consider any conceivable option. In the case of generic contexts, in which we did not focus, we defended that what was relevant was the relation to possible worlds and not to the actual world. Finally, all of these observations lead us to explain why Vendler noted a lack of existential import: FCI do not form referential expressions.
\bibliography{Mylibrary3}
\end{document}
当我编译时，我收到以下错误（仅限于我本周包含的参考文献，但在某些摘要中我尝试重新编译所有参考文献均未定义）：
package natbib Warning: Citation `dayalVariationEnglishFree2009' on page 2 unde
fined on input line 65.
Package natbib Warning: Citation `chierchiaLogicGrammarPolarity2013' on page 2
undefined on input line 65.
[2]
Package natbib Warning: Citation `arreguiCualquierExceptionPhrases2006' on page
3 undefined on input line 93.
我的 bibfile 的条目（通过 better bibtex 使用 zotero 生成）
@article{dayalVariationEnglishFree2009,
title = {Variation in {{English}} Free Choice Items},
author = {Dayal, Veneeta},
year = {2009},
pages = {237--256},
journal = {Universals and variation: Proceedings of GLOW in Asia VII}
}
@book{chierchiaLogicGrammarPolarity2013,
title = {Logic in Grammar: Polarity, Free Choice, and Intervention},
shorttitle = {Logic in Grammar},
author = {Chierchia, Gennaro},
year = {2013},
edition = {First edition},
publisher = {{Oxford University Press}},
address = {{Oxford}},
annotation = {OCLC: ocn827841360},
isbn = {978-0-19-969797-7 978-0-19-969798-4},
keywords = {Polarity (Linguistics)},
lccn = {P299.N4 C45 2013},
number = {2},
series = {Oxford Studies in Semantics and Pragmatics}
}