![你不能在垂直模式下使用‘\unskip’](https://linux22.com/image/449306/%E4%BD%A0%E4%B8%8D%E8%83%BD%E5%9C%A8%E5%9E%82%E7%9B%B4%E6%A8%A1%E5%BC%8F%E4%B8%8B%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8%E2%80%98%5Cunskip%E2%80%99.png)
所以我遇到了这个奇怪的错误:您无法在 Springer Latex 模板中以垂直模式使用“\unskip”。无论出于何种原因,这都是由最后一个 \end{proof} 之前的空白行引起的。也不确定如何生成较小的示例。
https://www.overleaf.com/2166494628jhkmqjhhjjsv
\documentclass[sn-mathphys,lineno]{sn-jnl}% Math and Physical Sciences Reference Style
\usepackage{microtype}
%\usepackage{xfrac}
%\usepackage{mathtools}
\usepackage{enumerate}
\usepackage{bbm}
%\usepackage{mathbbm}
%\usepackage{thm-restate}
\usepackage{subcaption}
\usepackage{cleveref}
\usepackage{comment}
\usepackage{xcolor}
%\usepackage[textwidth=20mm]{todonotes}
\jyear{2022}%
%% as per the requirement new theorem styles can be included as shown below
\theoremstyle{thmstyleone}%
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}% meant for continuous numbers
%%\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]% meant for sectionwise numbers
%% optional argument [theorem] produces theorem numbering sequence instead of independent numbers for Proposition
\newtheorem{proposition}{Proposition}%
%%\newtheorem{proposition}{Proposition}% to get separate numbers for theorem and proposition etc.
\newtheorem{example}{Example}%
\newtheorem{remark}{Remark}%
\newtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}
\newtheorem{corollary}{Corollary}
\theoremstyle{thmstyletwo}%
\theoremstyle{thmstylethree}%
\newtheorem{definition}{Definition}%
\newtheorem{claim}{Claim}
\newtheorem{inva}[theorem]{Invariant}
\raggedbottom
%%\unnumbered% uncomment this for unnumbered level heads
%%end of Springer Template
\newcommand{\hcom}[1]{\textcolor{blue}{#1}}
% \newcommand{\mmcom}[1]{\mytodo{agcolor}{#1}}
\newcommand{\mmcom}[1]{\textcolor{red}{#1}}
\newcommand{\algorithmautorefname}{Algorithm}
%\newcommand{\definitionautorefname}{Definition}
\newcommand{\trw}{\operatorname{tw}}
\newcommand{\pck}{\operatorname{pack}}
\newcommand{\cover}{\operatorname{cover}}
\newcommand{\lemmaautorefname}{Lemma}
\newcommand{\corollaryautorefname}{Corollary}
%\newcommand{\claimautorefname}{Claim}
\newcommand{\propositionautorefname}{Proposition}
\newcommand{\sectionautoref}{Section}
\newcommand{\remarkautorefname}{Remark}
\newcommand{\poly}[1]{\operatorname{poly}(#1)}
\renewcommand{|}{\vert}
\begin{document}
Let us give the details of the claim in \cite{ErdosPosaFlorent} that even cycles satisfy the Erdos Posa property with bounding function $f(k)=131k$.
Let $\mathcal{D}$ denote the class of diamonds, that is, graphs that are a subdivision of the graph on two vertices with three parallel edges between them.
Given a set $\mathcal{H}$ of graphs denote by $ \pck_\mathcal{H}(G)$ the maximum number of vertex disjoint copies of graphs in $\mathcal{H}$ and by $\cover_\mathcal{H}(G)$ the minimum size of an $\mathcal{H}$-transversal, a set of vertices $X$ for which $G \backslash X$ contains no subgraph isomorphic to a graph in $\mathcal{H}$.
Let $\trw(G)$ denote the treewidth of $G$.
For $x \in \mathbb{R}$, denote by $\lceil x \rceil $ smallest integer larger than $x$.
%%Denote by $\mathcal{D}$ the set of diamonds
That even cycles satisfy Erdos-Posa with $f(k)= 131k$ follows as a simple consequence of the following result of Fomin, Saurabh and Thilikos \cite{FominErdos}.
\begin{theorem}\label{packing diamonds}
\cite{FominErdos} For a planar graph $G$ $\pck_\mathcal{D}(G) \leq 131 \cover_\mathcal{D} (G) $.
\end{theorem}
\begin{lemma}
For a planar graph $ G $, $\trw(G) \leq 37 \pck(G)^{\frac{1}{2}}$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
% We show $\trw(G) \leq 18 \lceil \pck_\mathcal{D} (G)^{\frac{1}{2}} \rceil +1 $.
%% We need the following result of Robertson, Seymour and Thomas.
The following lemma
\begin{lemma}\cite{SeymourGrid}
Let $g \geq 1$ be an integer.
Every planar graph with no $g \times g$ grid minor has tree-width $ \leq 6g-5 $
\end{lemma}
\end{proof}
\bibliography{temp, EvenCycleTransversal}
\clearpage
\pagebreak
\appendix
\end{document}