Keepalived 不发送多播广告

Keepalived 不发送多播广告

我有两个系统,都是虚拟机。配置为使用桥接网络。我试图让 keepalived 管理 VIP - 10.190.1.230 的所有权。我尝试了 keepalived-1.2.2 和 keepalived-1.2.1 两个版本,都是从源代码构建的。

ServerA - RHEL5.2 x64 - 10.190.1.228 - PRIORITY 50
ServerB - RHEL6 x64 - 10.190.1.229 - PRIORITY 101
VIP - 10.190.1.230

我的问题似乎是 ServerB 上的 keepalived 没有发送多播广告。它正在查看来自 ServerA 的多播广告。

[root@ServerB~]# tcpdump -vv -c 3 -i eth0 vrrp
tcpdump: listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes
10:18:10.760577 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 856, offset 0, flags [none], proto VRRP (112), length 40)
10.190.1.228 > 224.0.0.18: VRRPv2, Advertisement, vrid 151, prio 50, authtype none, intvl 1s, length 20, addrs: 10.190.1.230
10:18:11.762039 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 857, offset 0, flags [none], proto VRRP (112), length 40)
10.190.1.228 > 224.0.0.18: VRRPv2, Advertisement, vrid 151, prio 50, authtype none, intvl 1s, length 20, addrs: 10.190.1.230
10:18:12.762883 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 858, offset 0, flags [none], proto VRRP (112), length 40)
10.190.1.228 > 224.0.0.18: VRRPv2, Advertisement, vrid 151, prio 50, authtype none, intvl 1s, length 20, addrs: 10.190.1.230
3 packets captured
3 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
[root@ServerB~]# 

如果我关闭 ServerA 上的 keepalived,并保持 tcpdump 运行,则看不到任何数据包。我使用以下简单的 keepalived 配置:

服务器 A - 10.190.1.228

 vrrp_instance VI_1 {
    interface eth0
    state BACKUP 
    virtual_router_id 151
    priority 50 
    virtual_ipaddress {
            10.190.1.230
    }
}

服务器 B - 10.190.1.229

vrrp_instance VI_1 {
    interface eth0
    state MASTER
    virtual_router_id 151
    priority 100 
    virtual_ipaddress {
        10.190.1.230
    }
}

我猜对了,因为 ServerA 无法看到来自 ServerB 上优先级更高的 keepalived 的 VRRPv2 广告,所以它持有 VIP:

[root@ServerA~]# ip add sh eth0
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
link/ether 08:00:27:59:58:c0 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.190.1.228/24 brd 10.190.1.255 scope global eth0
inet 10.190.1.230/32 scope global eth0
inet6 fe80::a00:27ff:fe59:58c0/64 scope link 
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
[root@ServerA~]# 

网络配置

两台机器上的防火墙均已禁用。两个接口均已设置 MULTICAST 标志。

我已经使用 iperf 发布到 VRRP 组:

[root@ServerB~]# iperf -u -c 224.0.0.18
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 224.0.0.18, UDP port 5001
Sending 1470 byte datagrams
Setting multicast TTL to 1
UDP buffer size:  122 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[  3] local 10.190.1.229 port 32929 connected with 224.0.0.18 port 5001
^C[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  3]  0.0- 0.6 sec  73.2 KBytes  1.05 Mbits/sec
[  3] Sent 51 datagrams
[root@ServerB~]# 

ServerA 可以看到此流量:

[root@ServerA~]# tcpdump -c 3 -i eth0 host 224.0.0.18
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
10:37:30.460427 IP 10.190.1.229.33088 > vrrp.mcast.net.commplex-link: UDP, length 1470
10:37:30.472247 IP 10.190.1.229.33088 > vrrp.mcast.net.commplex-link: UDP, length 1470
10:37:30.482908 IP 10.190.1.229.33088 > vrrp.mcast.net.commplex-link: UDP, length 1470
3 packets captured
10 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
[root@ServerA~]# 

以上内容让我认为这不是网络问题。我的路由表中没有多播路由,但以上内容表明我不需要多播路由。多播流量正在使用 eth0。

最后,以下是从 ServerB 上的 keepalived 注销:

May 18 10:40:46 ServerB Keepalived: Starting Keepalived v1.2.1 (05/17,2011)
May 18 10:40:46 ServerB Keepalived: Remove a zombie pid file /var/run/keepalived.pid
May 18 10:40:46 ServerB Keepalived: Registering Kernel netlink reflector
May 18 10:40:46 ServerB Keepalived: Registering Kernel netlink command channel
May 18 10:40:46 ServerB Keepalived: Registering gratutious ARP shared channel
May 18 10:40:46 ServerB Keepalived: Configuration is using : 55219 Bytes
May 18 10:40:46 ServerB Keepalived: Using LinkWatch kernel netlink reflector...

我还没有用 -D 开关运行它,这似乎是内存调试,对我来说意义不大。我已将 strace 输出上传到这里

当我使用 -n 标志(不分叉) strace keepalived 时,在上面链接的输出之后,我得到了以下输出:

sendto(3, "<30>May 18 10:58:50 Keepalived: "..., 68, MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0) = 68
sendto(3, "<30>May 18 10:58:50 Keepalived: "..., 75, MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0) = 75
rt_sigaction(SIGCHLD, {0x411b60, [], SA_RESTORER|SA_RESTART, 0x3db5a32a20}, {SIG_DFL, [], 0}, 8) = 0
select(1024, [4 6], [], [], {1, 0})     = 0 (Timeout)
select(1024, [4 6], [], [], {1, 0})     = 0 (Timeout)
select(1024, [4 6], [], [], {1, 0})     = 0 (Timeout)
select(1024, [4 6], [], [], {1, 0})     = 0 (Timeout)
[ etc ..]

这与 ServerA 上正在运行的 keepalived 的 strace 输出形成了对比,在其中我可以看到正在进行 sendto()、sendmdg() 和 recmsg() 调用。

答案1

天哪,我觉得自己太蠢了。我将 keepalived.conf 文件保存为 /etc/keepalived/ 中的 keepalived.cfg(我想我是从 haproxy.cfg 中得到的)。Keepalived 查找 /etc/keepalived/keepalive.conf。我启动 keepalived 时没有使用 -f 标志,因此它启动时没有配置。

如果我使用了 -d 选项(将 conf 转储到 syslog),我会看到它使用默认配置而不是选择我的设置。

相关内容