多个 DS 记录

Question

大多数操作员都希望DS忽略孤立记录。可能会遇到多个DSRR，其中一个或多个可能与相应的 RRset 不一致DNSKEY，这已得到充分记录。

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4035#section-2.4

2.4.  Including DS RRs in a Zone

   The DS resource record establishes authentication chains between DNS
   zones.  A DS RRset SHOULD be present at a delegation point when the
   child zone is signed.  The DS RRset MAY contain multiple records,
   each referencing a public key in the child zone used to verify the
   RRSIGs in that zone.  All DS RRsets in a zone MUST be signed, and DS
   RRsets MUST NOT appear at a zone's apex.

   A DS RR SHOULD point to a DNSKEY RR that is present in the child's
   apex DNSKEY RRset, and the child's apex DNSKEY RRset SHOULD be signed
   by the corresponding private key.  DS RRs that fail to meet these
   conditions are not useful for validation, but because the DS RR and
   its corresponding DNSKEY RR are in different zones, and because the
   DNS is only loosely consistent, temporary mismatches can occur.

这确定DS允许多个 RR，并且每个 RRSHOULD都由相应的 RR 签名DNSKEY。虽然没有明确说明遇到孤立 RR 时的具体行为DS，但可以确定不匹配的情况确实会发生，并且是可以预料的。

最后，人们可以从承认DNS is only loosely consistent相反的期望是错误的这一点中得出结论。因此，人们当然可以编写一个验证器实现来删除该区域作为伪造区域，但这样做并没有太大用处。归根结底，要考虑的主要因素是区域是否已签名，以及 RRsetDS和已签名的 RR 之间是否存在有效的加密路径。

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6840#section-5.11

5.11.  Mandatory Algorithm Rules

   The last paragraph of Section 2.2 of [RFC4035] includes rules
   describing which algorithms must be used to sign a zone.  Since these
   rules have been confusing, they are restated using different language
   here:

      The DS RRset and DNSKEY RRset are used to signal which algorithms
      are used to sign a zone.  The presence of an algorithm in either a
      zone's DS or DNSKEY RRset signals that that algorithm is used to
      sign the entire zone.

      A signed zone MUST include a DNSKEY for each algorithm present in
      the zone's DS RRset and expected trust anchors for the zone.  The
      zone MUST also be signed with each algorithm (though not each key)
      present in the DNSKEY RRset.  It is possible to add algorithms at
      the DNSKEY that aren't in the DS record, but not vice versa.  If
      more than one key of the same algorithm is in the DNSKEY RRset, it
      is sufficient to sign each RRset with any subset of these DNSKEYs.
      It is acceptable to sign some RRsets with one subset of keys (or
      key) and other RRsets with a different subset, so long as at least
      one DNSKEY of each algorithm is used to sign each RRset.
      Likewise, if there are DS records for multiple keys of the same
      algorithm, any subset of those may appear in the DNSKEY RRset.

   This requirement applies to servers, not validators.  Validators
   SHOULD accept any single valid path.  They SHOULD NOT insist that all
   algorithms signaled in the DS RRset work, and they MUST NOT insist
   that all algorithms signaled in the DNSKEY RRset work.  A validator
   MAY have a configuration option to perform a signature completeness
   test to support troubleshooting.

整体情况在这里变得更加清晰；验证者不应该负责监管和的所有可能排列DS。DNSKEY最重要的细节是是否存在有效路径。

Answer 1