☰

如何允许作者双姓氏之间换行年份式引文标注

tag-icon • tag-icon margins citing natbib
如何允许作者双姓氏之间换行年份式引文标注

当使用该软件包以“哈佛风格”引用双姓氏时natbib，有时会出现引用开头位于一行末尾的情况。似乎natbib不允许在双姓氏内使用换行符（即使姓名之间有空格）。

那么问题来了，如何才能避免这个问题呢？下面是这种行为的实际后果示例：

在此处输入图片描述

我是 LaTeX 新手，使用复杂的论文模板，不知道如何减少边距，以便重现之前屏幕截图中的情况。因此，最小示例代码需要进一步的对齐设置。如果您考虑尝试解决这个问题，我将不胜感激。

\documentclass[11pt]{article}

\usepackage[authoryear, comma]{natbib} %
\usepackage{verbatim,filecontents} %

\begin{filecontents*}{\jobname.bib}

    @article{mochales2009,
        author = {Mochales Palau, Raquel and Ieven, Aagje},
        title = {Funny Article About the Name of the Elephant},
        journal = {Elephant Intelligence and Human Reactions},
        year = {2009},
        numpages = {22},
        publisher = {Serious Publisher},
        address = {Western Pacific, Easter Islands},
    }

\end{filecontents*}

\setlength{\textwidth}{9.5cm}
\begin{document}

Other argumentation based issues are ambiguity of theory, ambiguity of
argumentation itself and subjectivity of the interpretation of written
arguments \citep[p. 21]{mochales2009}. They used the structured part of
the Araucaria corpus.

\bibliographystyle{plainnat}
\bibliography{\jobname}
\end{document}

答案1

有点笨拙，但它有效[！]：\allowbreak在姓氏的第一部分后插入一个指令，即，将字段写author为

author = {Mochales\allowbreak Palau, Raquel and Ieven, Aagje},

完整 MWE 的输出如下：

在此处输入图片描述

\documentclass[11pt]{article}

\usepackage[authoryear, comma]{natbib} 
\usepackage{verbatim,filecontents} 
\usepackage[colorlinks,allcolors=blue]{hyperref} % just for this example

\begin{filecontents*}{mybib.bib}
@article{mochales2009,
        author = {Mochales\allowbreak Palau, Raquel and Ieven, Aagje},
        title = {Funny Article About the Name of the Elephant},
        journal = {Elephant Intelligence and Human Reactions},
        year = {2009},
        numpages = {22},
        publisher = {Serious Publisher},
        address = {Western Pacific, Easter Islands},
}
\end{filecontents*}

\setlength{\textwidth}{9.5cm}
\begin{document}

Other argumentation based issues are ambiguity of theory, ambiguity of
argumentation itself and subjectivity of the interpretation of written
arguments \citep[p.~21]{mochales2009}. They used the structured part of
the Araucaria corpus.

\bibliographystyle{plainnat}
\bibliography{mybib}
\end{document}

相关内容