答案1
对我来说,标准方法有效。你试过这个吗?
\documentclass[]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
Thus, we get
\[
\bigl\{\beta^w_{u_j}\bigr\}_{j=1}^n
\]
and
\[
\bigl\{\beta^m_{u_j}\bigr\}_{j=1}^n
\]
In the same line:
\[
\bigl\{\beta^w_{u_j}\bigr\}_{j=1}^n
\quad\text{and}\quad
\bigl\{\beta^m_{u_j}\bigr\}_{j=1}^n
\]
This is a long line, so that the equations are in the middle of two lines.
Everything in the same line using inline $\bigl\{\beta^w_{u_j}\bigr\}_{j=1}^n$
and $\bigl\{\beta^m_{u_j}\bigr\}_{j=1}^n$. But this doesn't look good, because
it might stretch the linespacing.
Using
\[
\text{Thus, we get}\quad%
\bigl\{\beta^w_{u_j}\bigr\}_{j=1}^n
\quad\text{and}\quad
\bigl\{\beta^m_{u_j}\bigr\}_{j=1}^n
\]
does look better for the line spacing, but honestly it is not that pretty, imho.
\end{document}